Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
Some believe that young children have an intuition of personal character
quicker and more trustworthy than that of grown people. If this were so
it would be a strong argument in favor of the existence of a congenital
instinct which does not need experience and is impaired by it. My own
belief is that close observation of children under two years of age will
lead to the conclusion that personal impressions are developed by
experience. Yet it is possibly true that children three years old or
more are sometimes quicker and more acute judges of some traits, such as
sincerity and good will, than grown people. In so far as it is a fact it
may perhaps be explained in this way. The faces that children see and
study are mostly full of the expression of love and truth. Nothing like
it occurs in later life, even to the most fortunate. These images, we
may believe, give rise in the child’s mind to a more or less definite
ideal of what a true and kindly face should be, and this ideal he uses
with great effect in detecting what falls short of it. He sees that
there is something wrong with the false smile; it does not fit the image
in his mind; some lines are not there, others are exaggerated. He does
not understand what coldness and insincerity are, but their expression
puzzles and alarms him, merely because it is not what he is used to. The
adult loses this clear, simple ideal of love and truth, and the sharp
judgment that flows from it. His perception becomes somewhat vulgarized
by a flood of miscellaneous experience, and he sacrifices childish
spontaneity to wider range and more complex insight, valuing and
studying many traits of which the child knows nothing. It will not be
seriously maintained that, on the whole, we know people better when we
are children than we do later.
I put forward these scanty observations for what little they may be
worth, and not as disproving the existence of special instincts in which
Darwin and other great observers have believed. I do not maintain that
there is no hereditary aptitude to interpret facial expression—there
must be some sort of an instinctive basis to start from—but I think that
it develops gradually and in indistinguishable conjunction with
knowledge gained by experience.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account