Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
It is not to be inferred that we must go through the same visible and
tangible experiences as other people before we can sympathize with them.
On the contrary, there is only an indirect and uncertain connection
between one’s sympathies and the obvious events—such as the death of
friends, success or failure in business, travels, and the like—that one
has gone through. Social experience is a matter of imaginative, not of
material, contacts; and there are so many aids to the imagination that
little can be judged as to one’s experience by the merely external
course of his life. An imaginative student of a few people and of books
often has many times the range of comprehension that the most varied
career can give to a duller mind; and a man of genius, like Shakespeare,
may cover almost the whole range of human sentiment in his time, not by
miracle, but by a marvellous vigor and refinement of imagination. The
idea that seeing life means going from place to place and doing a great
variety of obvious things is an illusion natural to dull minds.
One’s range of sympathy is a measure of his personality, indicating how
much or how little of a man he is. It is in no way a special faculty,
but a function of the whole mind to which every special faculty
contributes, so that what a person is and what he can understand or
enter into through the life of others, are very much the same thing. We
often hear people described as sympathetic who have little mental power,
but are of a sensitive, impressionable, quickly responsive type of mind.
The sympathy of such a mind always has some defect corresponding to its
lack of character and of constructive force. A strong, deep
understanding of other people implies mental energy and stability; it is
a work of persistent, cumulative imagination which may be associated
with a comparative slowness of direct sensibility. On the other hand, we
often see the union of a quick sensitiveness to immediate impressions
with an inability to comprehend what has to be reached by reason or
constructive imagination.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account