Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
But love that plans and strives is always in some degree self-love. That
is, self-feeling is correlated with individualized, purposeful thought
and action, and so begins to spring up as soon as love lingers upon
something, forms intentions and begins to act. The love of a mother for
her child is appropriative, as is apparent from the fact that it is
capable of jealousy. Its characteristic is not selflessness, by any
means, but the association of self-feeling with the idea of _her_ child.
It is no more selfless in its nature than the ambitions of a man, and
may or may not be morally superior; the idea that it involves
self-abnegation seems to spring from the crudely material notion of
personality which assumes that other persons are external to the self.
And so of all productive, specialized love. I shall say more of the self
in the next chapter, but my belief is that it is impossible to cherish
and strive for special purposes without having self-feeling about them;
without becoming more or less capable of resentment, pride, and fear
regarding them. The imaginative and sympathetic aims that are commonly
spoken of as self-renunciation are more properly an enlargement of the
self, and by no means destroy, though they may transform, the “I.” A
wholly selfless love is mere contemplation, an escape from conscious
speciality, and a dwelling in undifferentiated life. It sees all things
as one and makes no effort.
These two sorts of love are properly complementary, one corresponding to
production and giving each of us a specialized intensity and
effectiveness, while in the other we find enlargement and relief. They
are indeed closely bound together and each contributory to the other.
The self and the special love that goes with it seem to grow by a sort
of crystallization about them of elements from the wider life. The man
first loves the woman as something transcendent, divine, or universal,
which he dares not think of appropriating; but presently he begins to
claim her as _his_ in antithesis to the rest of the world, and to have
hopes, fears, and resentments regarding her; the painter loves beauty
contemplatively, and then tries to paint it; the poet delights in his
visions, and then tries to tell them, and so on. It is necessary to our
growth that we should be capable of delighting in that upon which we
have no designs, because we draw our fresh materials from this region.
The sort of self-love that is harmful is one that has hardened about a
particular object and ceased to expand. On the other hand, it seems that
the power to enter into universal life depends upon a healthy
development of the special self. “Willst du in’s Unendliche schreiten,”
said Goethe, “geh nur im Endlichen nach allen Seiten.” That which we
have achieved by special, selfful endeavor becomes a basis of inference
and sympathy, which gives a wider reach to our disinterested
contemplation. While the artist is trying to paint he forfeits the pure
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account