Economic development -- Social aspects; Social evolution; Social problems; Work
Whereas it is we—we, the general public, with all these hereditary
heirlooms in our heads in place of facts—that are ten thousand years
behind them! We try to explain and assist the highly developed and
absolutely interdependent social processes by arguments from a
long-outgrown era of individualism. Theories of individual effort,
incentive, reward, competition, and “survival of the fittest,” we apply
to our own organic functions. If they do not fit, so much the worse for
the functions!
If we _were_ individuals, like the beasts, it would all hang together
well enough, thus: Here is a Bear. His business is the same old series,
maintenance, reproduction, and improvement; to be, to re-be, and to be
better. All of these ends he serves by the exercise of his own personal
abilities. These abilities, being _purely personal_, are only called
into exercise by personal wants or impulses. If the Bear found his food
on a plate before his cave every day he would indeed suffer from fatty
degeneration; his powers would decay, he would become less and less Bear
because he did less and less Bear-ing.
And conversely, if suitable difficulties (not too great) intervene
between him and his food, he develops the faculties to meet the
difficulties, and improves. If he is not a smart or strong Bear, and
cannot get much for himself and the little Bears, why, let them die;
better Bears will survive them, and the race improve by their absence.
If too much survival of the fittest left too much food for the
survivors, so that they became less fit, why up would pop others less
fit also to compete for the food, and thus a beautiful level of
Bearishness is maintained. This method of evolution we see plainly and
admire, perhaps unduly, as a “natural law.” All laws are natural. If not
natural—they are not laws; we only thought they were.
The essential difference between us and the Bears is in our _organic
relation_. The Bears have no common interests, common functions, common
good; we have. A perfect balance of highly superior Humans, muscular and
ferocious, with just food supply enough to keep up the fighting, and
just fighting enough to keep down the food supply, is scarcely a social
ideal. The social organism alters the matter completely. The human race
improves through production and exchange of products—Work. The work of
the human race improves under laws of organic evolution, of increasing
specialisation and interdependence. As society advances a man profits
less and less by what he does for himself, more and more by what others
do for him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account