Economic development -- Social aspects; Social evolution; Social problems; Work
Under the Ego concept they speak of “every man’s right to the product of
his own labour,” a sociological absurdity. In the first place no member
of Society has any “own” labour, our labour is all collective and
co-ordinate. In the second place it is not the product of his fraction
of our labour that a man wants, but the product of the labour of many
other persons, of all times and places. In the third place it is not
even “the equivalent” of his fraction of our labour that a man wants, it
is a previous supply of the social product bearing no relation to his
subsequent output except that of nourishment and stimulus.
In short, there is no true class-distinction in acceptance of those
deep-seated errors which together modify the conduct of mankind so
injuriously. The false classification we are treating is _the product of
those errors_. With right economic belief and action there would be no
division of Producer and Consumer, no Leisure Class, no Working Class,
no serried ranks of Capital and Labour. All would produce, all would
consume; all would work and all would have leisure; all would share in
the social capital and the social labour,—both elements of social
advantage.
The economic relation of the sexes is of enormous importance in our
present-day problems, as I have endeavored to point out in my previous
book, “Women and Economics.” The economic dependence of the female on
the male, her food being obtained, not in industrial relation with
society, but in the sex relation with the individual male, affects the
race not only through the ensuing overdevelopment of sex, but through an
artificial maintenance of primitive ideas and feelings in economics. The
woman’s artless attitude of taking all that is given her and frequently
asking for more, without ever entertaining the idea of return in kind,
of paying for her keep, maintains in the race, as we have previously
shown, the tendency to inordinate consumption, the quenchless appetite
of a parasite. This parasitic appetite is the invariable result of
economic dependence. We need not wonder at the evolution of a parasitic
class when we maintain, or seek to maintain, a parasitic sex.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account