Economic development -- Social aspects; Social evolution; Social problems; Work
Classify our sins. One enormous mass we call sins against property; all
forms of theft, robbery, and the larger and subtler kind of dishonest
appropriation. This class is the natural result of our perverted
distribution of social products. It is one of the many weak spots of the
Want theory that an absence of the essentials of life, instead of
promoting industry, often produces more direct and injurious methods of
transfer. Quite the larger part of our legal machinery is devoted to the
maintenance of the local congestion of wealth on the one hand, and to
the prevention of the breaking-down of the social tissues under pressure
of that congestion on the other. Given a surplus of wealth in some
places and a deficit in others, and the fabric of human nature breaks
down in a given proportion.
Want makes men steal quite as naturally as it makes them work, indeed
more so, as being the earlier custom. Our political economics founded on
the Want theory should give half their pages to a study of the
proportionate relation between Want, Theft, and Wealth, after the
learned discussion of Want, Work, and Wealth. One is as legitimate a
fact in economics as the other.
That normal distribution of social products which would provide the
growing individual with all that he needed to bring out his best powers,
and which would teach him clearly where and how to use those powers in
return, would drop out of the world completely this class of sins. The
supply coming _first_, the child growing up to measure his conduct as a
return for what has been given him; taught from infancy to see in the
world, behind and around him, the endless Giver, and himself as the
product of it all and owing his output to those now alive, and more
especially those to come—that child, that man, will have no
comprehension of theft, major or minor. In a word: All illegitimate
acquisition of property rests on the illegitimate retention of property.
Remove the cause, and you remove the effect.
What remains? Sins against the person. Part of these are based on
property also,—all murder and violence done “with interested motives,”
or in revenge for previous injury to property, or denial of property. A
large majority of the sins against the person would go, too, when we
establish right distribution.
There remain the sins based on the sex relation. The right economic
position for women will remove the greater part of these. When women no
longer make their living out of their loving, the prostitute, and that
more successful specialist, the mercenary wife, will leave the world.
The reduction of sex-attraction from its present fever-height to a
normal level, and the perfect freedom for true marriage resultant upon
right distribution of property, will take away the cruder and more
violent forms of sexual sin, and gives us pure monogamy at last.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account