Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th EditionKusel, Emil Edward
Religion
Humanitarian Philosophy, 4th Edition
Kusel, Emil Edward
Animal welfare; Vegetarianism -- Religious aspects
A. That's your idea because the "fittest" is yourself--in your own
estimation and power; but there's no godliness in such a contention.
It is your selfish conclusion that might is right at the expense of
sentient life.
Q. Do I not work hard and do I not know that I need meat to sustain me
in my manual labor? Do I not know what my system needs.
A. Your system does not require food which must come from a murdered
animal! When you contend that you must subsist on flesh, you know not
whereof you speak. You are talking to uphold your inhuman appetite.
Q. Where would medical research be were it not for vivisection
(torture) and killing animals for experiment in the interest of science?
A. I do not know, but I do know scientific men have not a moral right
to torture and kill harmless, helpless animals. Experimenting in
surgery, etc., should be done on humans who believe in the advancement
of medical science at the expense of life.
Q. Do you object to the infidel eating flesh food?
A. I do not object to anyone eating flesh food--eat whatever you like,
but I do point out the wrong of taking life and I emphatically say the
religious institution upholding slaughter is a farce and a pharisaical
monument to a man-made deity.
Q. Do you actually consider flesh eating the most abominable of sins?
A. Yes, absolutely the most abominable.
Q. What do you think of religious emotionalism and ecstasy?
A. If from the mouth of a carnivorous worshipper it is sham and
pretense--a mockery.
Q. Is not your feeling toward animals mawkish sentimentality?
A. There is no such thing as mawkish sentimentality in decrying
inhumanity.
Q. Do not the lower animals prey upon one another, and do not the big
fish eat the little fish?
A. You profess to be above the inferior animals and you profess to have
a soul; you also have a Golden Rule supposed to have been handed down
by a kind and merciful Creator.
Q. What shall we do with all the animals if we do not kill them?
A. Is that why you eat flesh?
Q. Do you really think carnivorous churchites are not of God?
A. I don't _think_ it, I _know_ it _absolutely_, because I know it
is wrong to kill and I know they know it and I know they search the
Scriptures for "proof" to satisfy palate while Conscience rebels.
Q. What do you think of a religionist who says, "I am living under a
new dispensation since Christ came and went, and I now eat anything the
Lord sets before me?"
A. If he means he can eat at the expense of sentient life he is not a
Godly man; he is not living in harmony with the Golden Rule; he is not
living according to the promptings of a higher self, consequently the
God spirit is dormant.
The church carnivora's favorite Bible quotations to justify his
inhumanity are invariably quoted from a petrified conscience and the
region of the palate. Here are several of the passages:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account