Humphry Davy, Poet and PhilosopherThorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Science
Humphry Davy, Poet and Philosopher
Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829
The Royal Institution possesses a book which no lover of science
can regard with other than reverential interest. It is a small,
well-bound quarto of some 386 manuscript pages, of notes taken by
Michael Faraday, when a bookbinder’s apprentice, of the last of Davy’s
lectures at the Institution. A Mr. Dance--his name deserves to be held
in remembrance--had given the youth a ticket for the lectures, and
Faraday, perched in the gallery over the clock, had zealously followed
the expositions of the brilliant lecturer, and had subsequently, when
asking for an engagement at the Institution, sent in these notes,
neatly written out and embellished with drawings of the apparatus, to
the Professor as evidence of the applicant’s “knowledge, diligence and
order.” Among the lectures is one on chlorine, given on March 14th,
1812, the notes of which are as characteristic of the auditor as of the
lecturer. We read:--
“Accustomed for years to consider the chemical principles of the
French School of Physical Sciences as correct, I had adopted
them and put faith in them until they became prejudices, and I
even felt unwilling to give them up when my judgment was fully
convinced by experiment that they were erroneous. I know that
this is the case in some degree with almost every person; he is
unwilling to believe that he is wrong and therefore feels averse
to adopt what is right when it opposes his principles.”
Then follows an account of various experiments showing the properties
of chlorine, and the proofs that it contains no oxygen:--
“Oxygen does combine with chlorine. I have ventured to name
the compound _euchlorine_; it is of a very bright yellow-green
colour. Names should represent things not opinions for in the
last case they often tend to misrepresent and mislead.
“Had Mr. Berthollet obtained oxygen from chlorine there would
have been no error in his theory, but by not attending to the
minute circumstances of his experiment, by not ascertaining that
the water present acted no part and was not decomposed he fell
into an error, and of course all the conclusions he drew were
false and erroneous. Nothing should be allowed but what can be
proved by experiment, and nothing should be taken for granted
upon analogy or supposition.”
Faraday concludes as follows:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account