Humphry Davy, Poet and PhilosopherThorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Science
Humphry Davy, Poet and Philosopher
Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829
“Potasium [_sic_] and sodium are the names by which I have
ventured to call the new substances; and whatever changes of
theory, with regard to the composition of bodies, may hereafter
take place, these terms can scarcely express an error; for
they may be considered as implying simply the metals produced
from potash and soda. I have consulted with many of the most
eminent scientific persons in this country, upon the methods of
derivation, and the one I have adopted has been the one most
generally approved. It is perhaps more significant than elegant.
But it was not possible to found names upon specific properties
not common to both; and though a name for the basis of soda might
have been borrowed from the Greek, yet an analogous one could not
have been applied to that of potash, for the ancients do not seem
to have distinguished between the two alkalies.”
He thinks there is the greater necessity for avoiding any theoretical
views in terms because the time is yet far distant for a complete
generalisation of chemical facts, and although the antiphlogistic
explanation of the phenomena has been uniformly adopted, the motive for
employing it has been rather a sense of its beauty and precision than a
conviction of its permanency and truth.
“The discovery of the agencies of the gases destroyed the
hypothesis of Stahl. The knowledge of the powers and effects
of the etherial substances may at a future time possibly act
a similar part with regard to the more refined and ingenious
hypothesis of Lavoisier; but in the present state of our
knowledge, it appears the best approximation that has been made
to a perfect logic of chemistry.”
Led by analogy, Davy soon convinced himself that the volatile
alkali--ammonia--also contained oxygen, and in amount not less than 7
or 8 per cent. It is not necessary to go into detail concerning the
experiments on which this erroneous conclusion was founded. Davy was
subsequently made aware of his error; but at the time he seemed anxious
to overturn--as, indeed, he did in the end, but on other grounds--the
Lavoisierian doctrine that oxygen was the principle of acidity, by
showing that it was equally the principle of alkalescence.
In concluding his paper, he mentions that he has begun experiments on
the alkaline earths.
“From analogy alone it is reasonable to expect that the alkaline
earths are compounds of a similar nature to the fixed alkalies,
peculiar highly combustible metallic bases united to oxygen. I
have tried some experiments upon barytes and strontites, and they
go far towards proving that this must be the case.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account