Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
896-1520. The first period is exceedingly poor in written remains of
literature. In fact, the first and thus the oldest literary relic of
the Hungarian language is a short “Funeral Sermon” (_Halotti Beszéd_),
dating from the first third of the thirteenth century; and for 200 years
after that date, we meet, with the exception of a Hungarian glossary of
the year 1400, recently discovered at Schlaegl, in Upper Austria, with
no example of a Hungarian literary work of even slight extent. From the
middle of the fifteenth century we possess a fragment, called after
the town where it was discovered, by Dr. Julius Zacher in 1862, the
“_Königsberg_ (in Prussia) _Fragment_.” Thus, the number of extant, or
hitherto discovered Hungarian works of even slight literary merit is,
down to 1450 A.D., an almost negligible quantity. Mr. Szilády in his
“Collection of Ancient Hungarian Poets” (_Régi Magyar Költők Tára_) has
indeed communicated six and fifty mediæval Hungarian church-poems and
other fragments; but of that number scarcely a dozen are original poems,
the rest being mere translations of the then current church-poetry. The
philologist may no doubt find much to glean from even this scant harvest
of Hungarian Literature in the first period. For literature proper, it
is of no account whatever. Yet it would be unfair to leave this period
without even a passing mention of its oral literature, or epic and
legendary stories, of which there must have been no small quantity in
those agitated times.
The Hungarian naïve epic is lost. A glance at the habits of the Finns
will, however, suffice to satisfy the inquirer that the Hungarians, like
their cousins in Russia, must have cultivated the art of recitation and
oral handing down of the glorious deeds of their ancestors, to no small
extent. We now know that the immense epic of the Finns, the _Kalevala_,
has been transmitted from generation to generation by bards who had
treasured up in their memories the endless _runot_ recording the deeds
of Lemminkäinen, Väinämöinen, and Jlmarinen. The Hungarians, too, had
their bards, called _igrigeczek_, or _hegedősök_ (violinists); and at
the manors of the nobles or the courts of the kings, old heroic songs
were recited about Attila, King of the Huns; his brother, Bleda; the
fearful battle on the Catalaunian fields (Chalons-sur-Marne, 451 A.D.);
the building of the castle of Buda; the siege of Aquileia; and the last
fatal wedding of the terrible Hun. These Hun epics were widely known and
recited in mediæval Hungary, as witnessed by the chronicles of those
times. The people firmly believed themselves to be the successors of
Attila’s hordes, and this belief, although absolutely discountenanced by
modern historians, is still lingering in the spinning-halls of Hungarian
villages, and in lecture halls in England and America.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account