Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
During the seventeenth century Hungary was oppressed by two evils of
apparently antagonistic character; either of which, however, was to have
the same fatal effect on Hungarian Literature. On the one hand, nearly
two-thirds of Hungary proper, as apart from Transylvania, was under
Turkish rule; on the other, the Habsburgs, then at their apogee, waged a
relentless war against the liberties and independence of the Hungarians
both in non-Turkish Hungary and in Transylvania. In the latter country,
the Bocskays, Bethlens, and Rákóczys had in succession contrived to
establish a Hungarian principate which, although acknowledging Turkish
ascendancy, yet retained many of the rights of sovereignty. These two
sets of circumstances were in themselves hurtful to the development
of anything relating to Hungarian nationality, and most of all to
Hungarian Literature. The counties under Turkish rule could not, by the
very nature of the oppression under which they smarted, produce any
literary movement at all. The counties under Austrian rule were held in
bondage both political and intellectual, which stifled all attempts at a
national literature. The sages have as yet not been able to prove, that
a republican government must of necessity be beneficial to the material
and political welfare of a nation. As to the intellectual progress
of a nation, on the other hand, Liberty is generally taken to be an
indispensable condition. Literature is possible only where there is at
least a republic of minds. The Austrian government took good precautions
to render the rise of such a republic in Hungary an impossibility. All
the higher and middle schools in Austrian Hungary were, during the
seventeenth century, in the hands of the Jesuits. The order of Jesus
has not, as is well known, prevented a very great number of its members
and pupils from rising to eminence in Theology and in Science. It could
not, owing to its cosmopolitan and anti-national constitution, further
movements of national literature. Quite apart from the debatable nature
of its moral and political teachings, it retarded or stopped all such
movements by employing in its schools the Latin language as the vehicle
of instruction. At Nagyszombat (in 1635); at Kassa (in 1657); at Buda (in
1687), the Jesuits founded, or taught in, universities, where lectures
on all branches of knowledge were delivered in the mongrel language of
the mediæval Scholastics, which has always had a baneful influence both
on knowledge and its students. In the Protestant schools, the number of
which exceeded seven hundred and fifty, the same radically false system
was observed. The consequence was, that the vast majority of Hungarians
had never received a living knowledge of either the history of Man or of
Nature, and could accordingly turn their dead intellectual capital to no
account. The only Hungarians whose mental acquirements had sufficient
vitality to serve as stimulants to literary production of a higher type
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account