Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
1772-1825.
1772-1825. After a period of decadence, lasting for over sixty years,
Hungarian Literature was again brought to a state of revival and
progress, which has gone on almost uninterruptedly to the present day.
This revival is part of an immense revolution which swept over most
countries of continental Europe in the second half of the last century.
The most conspicuous and best known event of this Modern Renascence is
the series of terrific upheavals and wars commonly called the French
Revolution. It is, however, quite evident that the French Revolution
was only the politic aspect of a vast movement, which in many countries
outside France assumed the garb of intellectual revolutions. Thus the
mental achievements that, in their totality, are called the “classical
period” of German literature (1750-1805) are in the domain of Thought
and Sentiment, a revolution no less colossal and far-reaching than were
the ever-memorable proceedings of the French _assemblées_, or the bloody
epics of the Revolutionary campaigns. Both were gigantic onslaughts
against the _Ancien Régime_ in institutions, manners, thought and
sentiment. Accordingly, the course of both revolutions was—making due
allowance for externals—essentially the same. As the French Revolution
landed in, or rather was brought to its final consummation in the titanic
and all-embracing personality of Napoleon, so German literature met its
final trysting-place and culmination in the orchestral mind of Goethe.
The minor nations of Europe were seized by the same Revolution, if in a
manner considerably less intense. The very aggressiveness of the French
Revolution, its encroachments on the territories of Italy, Switzerland,
Germany and Austria, prevented those minor nations from enacting their
Revolution at once in its intellectual and political aspects. While
fighting the French, they were all engaged in following them on the lines
of the Revolution, first (1790-1830) for intellectual freedom; and then,
after the defeat of the French armies (1830-1848), for the very political
ideals that the French had been the first to proclaim. For, this was the
immense advantage of the French over the other nations on the continent:
they had brought their intellectual revolution through men like Turgot,
d’Alembert, Diderot, Voltaire, Rousseau, etc., to maturity, before they
started for their crusade of politic liberty; whereas the other nations
were a generation or two behind-hand, and still in the throes of their
intellectual renascence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account