Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey — John Shaqi
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
In comparing Hungarian Literature with the literature of the Germans,
French or English, we cannot but recognize, for the reasons just
mentioned, that the splendour and comprehensiveness of the Literature of
those nations cannot be found in that of the Magyars. At the same time we
make bold to point out an advantage which Hungarian Literature has over
the literature of many another nation, if not in the past, certainly in
the future. This advantage is in the Hungarian language. The Magyars have
a language of their own. It is not a borrowed language; not one taken
from another nation, in whose use it had been for centuries.
The Americans, both in North and South America, although they are in
nearly everything else the counterparts of their European parent-nations,
have yet preserved the idioms of the latter. In politics, social
constitution, individual temper, and attitude of mind, the North and
South Americans are—a long stay in that continent has convinced us of
that—utterly different from either the English or the Spanish. The
Americans proper have indeed built up, or developed into a nation
of their own. For good or for bad, they have a distinct and novel
national personality. One thing excepted; that one thing, however, is
a vital element in the intellectual activity of a nation. We mean, of
course, Language. The Americans have moulded and coloured all the
old elements of their nationality into organs with a tone and hue of
their own. Language alone they have, with slight differences, taken
over and preserved in the very form and woof in which the English and
Spanish had left it in the old colonies. Hence there is between the
Americans, as a new nation, and their language, as an old and foreign
idiom, a discordance and discrepancy that no genius can entirely remove.
The words of a language are mostly gentry of olden descent. Between
them there are associations and tacit understandings ill-fitted for
an environment essentially different from their original cast. This
discrepancy has, there can be little doubt, exercised a baneful influence
on the literature of the American nations. It has baulked them of the
higher achievements, and neither in the literature of North America
nor in that of South America can we meet with literary masterworks of
the first rank. Between the poets and writers of those nations and the
languages they are using there is much of that antagonism which has
always been found to exist between the cleverest of Neo-Latin poets and
the language of Rome. Latin is a dead language; and all the intellectual
atmosphere and soil that nurtured and developed it have long since ceased
to stimulate. Accordingly, the Politiani and Sadoleti, the Sannazari
and Buchanani, and all others who in modern times have tried to revive
Latin literature have entirely failed. As with individuals so it is with
nations. The Belgians, or the Swiss in Europe are, like the Americans,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account