Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
Hungary, in extent larger than the United Kingdom, is, geographically
speaking, one large basin, watered by one large river and its affluents,
and bounded by one imposing range of mountains. The river is called
the Danube, the mountains are the Carpathian offshoots of the Alps.
This geographical unity makes Hungary almost predestined to be the seat
of one nation. The natural unity calls for, it may be presumed, the
national. Yet the very richness of the soil, diversified as it is by
the vegetable and mineral wealth of huge mountains, and the cereal and
animal exuberance of vast plains has, in all times, attracted numerous
tribes from eastern Europe and western and central Asia to the country
of the “blue” Danube, and the “blonde” Theiss. Some of these invaders
succeeded for a time in establishing a kind of dominion over parts of
Hungary. Thus the Huns in the fifth, the Gepidae in the fifth and sixth,
the Avars in the seventh and eighth, numerous Slav tribes in the eighth
and ninth centuries were successively lords of the plains and some
mountainous parts of Hungary. Not one of these peoples, however, could
either maintain themselves as rulers, or quite disappear as dwellers.
Already in the ninth century we find Hungary inhabited by more than
fifteen different nations or portions of nations, offering then the
same gorgeous medley of Humanity that is still so characteristic of the
country. Where the above nations failed, the Magyars signally succeeded.
They and they alone of all the numerous, if not perhaps innumerable
nations that had tried to rear a lasting polity on the columns of the
Carpathians, and behind the moats of the Danube; the Hungarians alone,
we say, succeeded in establishing themselves as the permanent rulers
of the Slav and Turanian peoples of Hungary, and as the members of a
state endowed with abiding forces of order within and power without.
From 996 to 1301 A.D., they took their dukes and kings from the family
of the Árpáds, under whom they had entered (some 100,000 men, women,
and children) the country. Saint Stephen (the first canonized king)
consolidated their constitution. Without attempting to overrate the value
of constitutions either grown or made, and, while laying due stress on
that _geometria situs_, or providential strategy in the location of
nations which has perhaps wrought the major part of History, it is
tolerably certain, that the constitution of Hungary, as developed under
the Árpád dynasty, and as still surviving in some of its essential
elements, has had a most beneficial influence on the public life of the
Magyars. Like that of England, it combines the excellency of the Latin
system of centralization, with the advantages of the Germanic custom of
local autonomy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account