I’m afraid for once we have to admit that the Bishops are right.
In spite of everything the Church can do, in spite of an education
committed, so far as the authorities can control it, to sour or
religious spinsters, the modern young woman is not very moral. It is
a pathetic picture which the author of _Lysistrata_ has drawn for us,
of sexless beings going to and fro in tube and bus-like shuttles in
a machine to dull work robbed of all joy, earning their livelihood
and turning their backs on man in response to feminist propaganda.
Man, the enemy――to be defeated in his own professions, to be repelled
in every onslaught upon feminine virtue: I wonder? I would hazard a
guess that, relatively to the population, fewer women retain their
virginity till death than in the Victorian period or the Middle Ages.
In all probability it is sex, not sexlessness, which makes women
cling so tenaciously to the right to earn their living. Marriage
brings a jealous intolerant husband, children, prying and impertinent
neighbours――degraded and humiliating slavery for the vast majority of
women. Thirty shillings a week and typing or working in a shop, a still
tongue, or a toss of the head and the assertion that independence is
the best; and, in the background a lover with whom somehow evenings are
spent――a lover who has no claim and cannot tyrannize. A lover, perhaps,
who pleads to become a husband, but has no chance unless his income is
good or secure. Marriage would change him: Aspasia knows it. Marriage
would also rob her of that thirty shillings a week, which alone stands
between her and the abyss of primeval submission. Or else Aspasia
teaches in a school or college. She is a skilled teacher, devoted to
her work and pupils. She may be a Research Fellow in some difficult
branch of learning which is to her the very breath of life. She may
be a doctor in the public service, tending and advising mothers and
children. She is lovely, vital, creative. Man approaches. There are
holidays of delight and secret dread of the scandal which will end the
work Aspasia loves――or marriage and the certainty of that end at once.
“Choose,” say the Bishops and the school-managers (often the same
thing): “Choose,” say the public authorities who support the Church
and rather wish women would get out of this indelicate profession of
surgery and medicine; “choose between love and duty to the male and
service to the community.” This is not feminism――feminists have fought
it persistently――it is medieval Christianity. It presents a choice
between physical pleasure and service to the mind or soul; it upholds
the time-honoured theory that renunciation of the world, the flesh, and
the devil is the path to duty and salvation. I am fully aware of all
the arguments about economic pressure, the primary right of married
men to work, the awful situation of their dependent children and their
wives. None of this is fundamental, and the jealous male knows it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account