“In Japan,” says the Baron, “the idea of the ‘encouragement of
what is good, and the chastisement of what is bad,’ has always
been kept in view in writing works of fiction, or in preparing
dramatic books and plays. I know very well that there is some
opposition to this idea. They say that the writing of fiction
should be viewed as an art. Hence, so long as the real nature
and character are depicted, there is an end of the function of
these works. I do not pretend in any way to challenge this
argument, but I simply state that it was not so regarded in
Japan. Consequently, with us, some kind of reward or
chastisement is generally meted out to the fictitious
characters introduced in the scene, and these representations,
either in books or on the stage, are carried out to such a
pitch as to leave some sort of profound impression on the minds
of the readers or of the audience. Whatever the other remaining
parts may be, these features always remain uppermost in the
minds of the reader or of the theatre-goer. The prominent point
thus produced is generally a transcendent loyalty, such as a
loyal servant would feel for his master; the great fortitude
and perseverance which one exhibits in the cause of justice and
righteousness; severe suffering for the sake of a dear friend;
the devotion of parents and their self-sacrifice, great
suffering, or even self-sacrifice of a wife for her husband, or
of a mother for her son, to enable the fulfilment of duty to
the lord and master. I can myself remember many times shedding
tears when reading works of fiction, or when listening to the
singing of dramatic songs, or while witnessing dramatic
performances. This peculiarity seems to be wanting on the
Western stage. I remember once in London, years ago, my eyes
becoming moist when I saw a character on the stage, who was
being taken away as a prisoner, shaking hands with the man who
had been his dear friend, but who ought to have been suspected
as the cause of his being taken prisoner, and told him, as he
went, that he would never suspect or ever forsake him, giving
the audience a strong impression of chivalric moral strength.
But that was only a solitary experience.”
As these lines come before my eyes, as I remember the siege of Port
Arthur, I wonder at the subtle irony lurking beneath Baron Suyematsu’s
remark--“Japan is now in alliance with Great Britain; she may not
_perhaps_ be worthy of that alliance, but one may be assured she is
doing, and will always do, her best to deserve it.” The italics are
mine.
The heroism displayed by the Japanese in the late war was almost
unparalleled. I believe only one spy in Japan was discovered. He was
kicked to death. No pro-Russian party existed in Japan.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account