Icarus : $b or, The future of scienceRussell, Bertrand
Philosophy
Icarus : $b or, The future of science
Russell, Bertrand
Civilization; Science; Science and state
If men were rational in their conduct, that is to say, if they acted
in the way most likely to bring about the ends that they deliberately
desire, intelligence would be enough to make the world almost a
paradise. In the main, what is in the long run advantageous to one
man is also advantageous to another. But men are actuated by passions
which distort their view; feeling an impulse to injure others, they
persuade themselves that it is to their interest to do so. They
will not, therefore, act in the way which is in fact to their own
interest unless they are actuated by generous impulses which make
them indifferent to their own interest. This is why the heart is as
important as the head. By the “heart” I mean, for the moment, the
sum-total of kindly impulses. Where they exist, science helps them
to be effective; where they are absent, science only makes men more
cleverly diabolic.
It may be laid down as a general principle to which there are few
exceptions that, when people are mistaken as to what is to their own
interest, the course they believe to be wise is more harmful to others
than the course that really is wise. There are innumerable examples of
men making fortunes because, on moral grounds, they did something which
they believed to be contrary to their own interests. For instance,
among early Quakers there were a number of shopkeepers, who adopted
the practice of asking no more for their goods than they were willing
to accept, instead of bargaining with each customer, as everybody else
did. They adopted this practice because they held it to be a lie to
ask more than they would take. But the convenience to customers was so
great that everybody came to their shops and they grew rich. (I forget
where I read this, but if my memory serves me it was in some reliable
source). The same policy _might_ have been adopted from shrewdness,
but in fact no one was sufficiently shrewd. Our unconscious is more
malevolent than it pays us to be; therefore the people who do most
completely what is in fact to their interest are those who, on moral
grounds, do what they believe to be against their interest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account