Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard ShawHuneker, James
History
Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard Shaw
Huneker, James
Dramatists; European drama -- 19th century -- History and criticism; European drama -- 20th century -- History and criticism
With the advent of the Naquet divorce bill in France the countenance
of problem plays underwent a radical change. A ministerial stroke of
the pen invalidated Dumas _fils_ and his unhappy women as a theme for
dramatic treatment. We have had plays dealing with the unpleasant
subject since then, but these were either frankly frivolous like
those of Alfred Capus, or wittily cynical with those of Maurice
Donnay. The modern master builder of French drama, Henry Becque, wrote
L'Enlèvement, in which he presented the question with his accustomed
clearness and probity. Hervieu, in Le Dédale, shows the influence
of at least one scene of Becque, though he has handled the incident
so individually as to deflect its conclusions completely. Since
L'Enlèvement there has been no such literary performance as Le Dédale,
which proved a labyrinth indeed for its unhappy characters and a
masterpiece in form.
The story is a simple one, direct as antique tragedy, and far from
being improbable. Divorce in France is a much more complicated matter
than in America. Society, notwithstanding its cynical attitude, is
not too favourable to divorced men and women, particularly women.
The church refuses to sanction separation if it is to be followed by
remarriage. Whether forged in heaven or elsewhere, the fetters of
wedlock are never to be loosed unless by death. Now Hervieu does not
pretend to a sympathy with either society or the church. He does not
attempt to win our suffrages for the woman or for the man. His is too
judicial an intellect to show partisanship, and he is too superior an
artist to turn his play into a moral tract. He dives deeper than the
law or society; he dives straight into the human heart, and after
setting forth his situations his summing up is irrefragable. From the
clash of his warring souls comes his tragedy; the divorce is a mere
pretext to set his people in action. The law of the species, that
compelling and terrible law, is his weapon, a formidable one in his
skilled hands. His thesis, baldly stated, is this: A man and a woman
once married are married until death, if there be a child. Let the law
supervene, let vagrant passion demolish the social structure, this
stark, naked fact remains--the flesh of the child unites the parents
in the bond of eternity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account