Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard ShawHuneker, James
History
Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard Shaw
Huneker, James
Dramatists; European drama -- 19th century -- History and criticism; European drama -- 20th century -- History and criticism
On one occasion, when Edmond de Goncourt was openly rude to her at
her Château Saint-Gratien, she, with her guests, sat stupefied.
Later he apologized, tears in his eyes--he was a gallant, handsome
gentleman--and he relates most ingenuously, "Suddenly she put her arms
around me and kissed me on each cheek, saying, 'Of course I forgive
you--you know how truly attached I am to you; I also, of late, have
felt quite nervous and upset.'"
It was this passage that caused Henry James to shiver; not because
of the fact, but the lack of tact. The De Goncourts were taken up
by the Princess in 1862. Jules, the younger brother, died in 1870,
literally killed by his devotion to literary art. The chiselling of
the De Goncourt phrases was deadly to brain and body. It is little
wonder that their novels, one after the other, until Germinie Lacerteux
appeared, should have been indifferently received. As Alphonse Daudet,
ever receptive and tender in his judgments of original work, wrote:
"Novels such as had never been seen before; novels that were neither
moulded upon Balzac nor diluted from George Sand, but novels made up
of pictures,... with plot scarcely indicated, and great blanks between
the chapters; real break-neck ditches for the bourgeois reader. To
this add an entirely new style, full of surprises--a style from which
all conventionality is banished, and which, by a studied originality
of phrase and image, forbids any commonplace in the thought; and then
the bewildering boldness, the perpetual uncoupling of words accustomed
to march together like oxen dragging a plough, the earnest care in
selection, the horror of saying all and anything; considering this,
how can one be astonished that the De Goncourts were not immediately
greeted by the applause of the common herd?"
The mystery of it is, Why should the De Goncourts have cared for the
applause of that same bourgeois public they so despised, reviled,
and held up to mockery in their books? Gautier, Zola, Daudet, had to
work like galley slaves for a living; the two brothers and Flaubert
were rich, as riches go with literary men; why, then, did they care
whether they were popular or not? Was it because they were human,
notwithstanding their theories of impassibility, perfection, and art
for art's sake?
The Château Saint-Gratien was the Princess Mathilde's country home
until her death. There she entertained, as entertained George Sand
at Nohant, all her friends. Until his death, in 1896, Edmond de
Goncourt was her privileged visitor. The work of the two brothers in
eighteenth-century chronicles amused and interested her, especially
their minute histories of such actresses as Du Barry, Sophie Arnold;
and, earlier, great women like Mme. de Pompadour, the Duchess of
Châteauroux; great painters, Watteau, Boucher, Latour, Greuze, Lancret,
Fragonard; and stage favourites such as Mesdames Saint Huberty,
Clairon, and La Guimard.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account