Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard ShawHuneker, James
History
Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard Shaw
Huneker, James
Dramatists; European drama -- 19th century -- History and criticism; European drama -- 20th century -- History and criticism
It is pleasant to record the impressions of a performance of this play
at the Lessing Theatre, Berlin, September 30, 1904. Director Otto Brahm
has long been a noted Ibsenite, his brochure familiar to all students
of the Scandinavian master. Ibsen, in German, plays decidedly smoother,
with more sonority and an abundance of the much-decried "atmosphere."
The stage settings, as is usual at this artistic playhouse, were
beautiful. Yet one felt the danger of transferring to the boards such
an imaginative idea. In the hands of Agnes Sorma the difficult rôle of
Ellida would not have suffered. Irene Triesch, despite her unequivocal
sincerity, is not temperamentally suited to the part. A mermaid who is
given to morbid reveries and a fierce buccaneer-like stranger hardly
convince us in this miracle-hating age. Each time the sailor appeared
with his big cloak and melodramatic hat I expected to hear the theme
of the Flying Dutchman intoned by an invisible orchestra. The human
half of the story is more credible. Boletta and Hilda are real flesh
and blood, while the tutor Arnholm, impersonated by that excellent
character-actor, Emmanuel Reicher, was as big a bore as Ibsen probably
intended him to be. The Lady from the Sea is an attempt to capture a
mood in which Maeterlinck might have been more successful.
* * * * *
XIII
HEDDA GABLER
(1890)
Hedda Gabler is a great play, great despite its unpleasant theme,
and also remarkable, inasmuch as its subject-matter is essentially
undramatic--"the picture not of an action but of a condition," as Henry
James puts it. The Norwegian poet usually begins to develop his drama
where other writers end theirs. Yet so wonderful is his art that we are
treated to no long explanations, no retrospective speeches; indeed, the
text of an Ibsen play is little more than a series of memoranda for the
players. Cuvier-like, the actor must reconstruct a living human from a
mere bone of a word. These words seem detached, seem meaningless, yet
in action their cohesiveness is unique; dialogue melts into dialogue,
action is dovetailed to action, and fleeting gestures reveal a state of
soul. Ibsen does not read as well as he acts. He is extremely difficult
to interpret for the reason that the old technic of the actor is
inadequate, as Bernard Shaw long ago declared.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account