Illogical Geology, the Weakest Point in the Evolution TheoryPrice, George McCready
Science
Illogical Geology, the Weakest Point in the Evolution Theory
Price, George McCready
Evolution; Paleontology
"But never in the history of science did a stranger hallucination arise
than that of Cuvier and the modern school, when they supposed themselves
to discard theory and build on a foundation of accurately ascertained
fact. Never was a system devised in which theory was more rampant;
theory, too, unsupported by observation, and, as we now know, utterly
erroneous. From beginning to end of Cuvier's method and its
applications, assumptions were made for which there was no ground, and
these assumptions were treated as demonstrable facts. The very point to
be proved was taken for granted, and the evolutionary geologists who
boasted of their avoidance of speculation, were in reality among the
most hopelessly speculative of all the generations that had tried to
solve the problem of the theory of the earth."
FOOTNOTES:
[13] The onion-coat hypothesis, which is the only other alternative,
modern science professes to have abandoned.
[14] When the text-books speak of ten or twelve miles thickness of the
fossiliferous rocks, the reader should remember how the rocks have
to be patched up together from here and there to make this
incredible thickness, as only a small fraction of such a thickness
exists in any one place.
[15] "Manual," p. 399, Fourth Ed.
[16] "Manual," p. 408.
[17] "Manual of Historical Geol.," p. 74.
[18] "Hist.," p. 360.
[19] "Founders of Geology," p. 112.
CHAPTER IV
FACT NUMBER TWO
If we had ample evidence that a certain man was personally acquainted
with Julius Caesar, that they were born in the same town, went to school
together, served in the same wars, and later carried on an extensive
mutual correspondence, would we not conclude that they must have lived
in the same age of the world's history? I confess that the conclusion
seems quite unavoidable. Who would dream that eighteen centuries or more
had separated the two lives, and that while one was an old Roman the
other was an American of the latter nineteenth century?
Some such a puzzle as this is presented in geology under the general
subject of =conformability=. Let me define this term.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account