Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classicalQuackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
History
Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classical
Quackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
Classical literature -- History and criticism; Oriental literature -- History and criticism
=Characteristics.=—Oldest of all the Indo-European tongues, and most
closely resembling the common parent that is lost, is SANSCRIT—the
language spoken by those fair-skinned Aryans who more than thirty
centuries ago, swarming through the Hindoo Koosh passes, made the sunny
plains of Hindostan their own (page 16). Sanscrit spread over most of
the peninsula; and the meaning of the word, _perfected_, is significant
of the flexibility, refinement, regularity, and philosophical system
of grammar, by which the language was distinguished. In luxuriance
of inflection it was unequalled. Its nouns were varied according to
eight cases, and three numbers (singular, dual, and plural); and
its verbs, which assumed causal, desiderative, and frequentative
forms, were carried in conjugation through three voices, the
active, middle, and passive. Its chief fault—a result of its very
richness—lay in the frequent use of long compounds, particularly
adjectives, presenting what seems to us a confused combination of
ideas, sometimes ludicrously lengthened out; as in the expressions,
“always-to-be-remembered-with-reverence patriot,” “water-play-delighted
maidenn-bathing-fragrant river-breezes” (that is, _river-breezes made
fragrant by the bathing of maidens delighted with sporting in the
water_). (_Consult Dr. Perry’s “Sanscrit Primer.”_)
Neither the parallelism of Hebrew poetry (page 89) nor the rhyme of
modern times finds a place in Sanscrit verse; it is distinguished from
prose, like Greek poetry, simply by a metrical arrangement of long
and short syllables. The measured cadence gave great delight to the
cultivated ear of the Hindoos. “There are two excellent things in the
world,” says one of their writers—“the friendship of the good, and the
beauties of poetry.”
Sanscrit is now a dead language. About three hundred years before the
Christian era, dialects similarly derived took its place among the
people, and it has since been kept alive only in the conversation and
writings of the learned, as the sacred language of the Brahmans, or
priestly caste.[4] Yet so extensive is its literature that it costs a
Brahman half his life to master a portion of its sacred books alone.
[Illustration: BRAHMAN PRIEST.]
=Sanscrit Alphabet.=—As to the origin of the Sanscrit alphabet,
consisting of fifty letters, history is silent. It is believed that
the entire early literature was preserved for centuries by oral
repetition. When their polished tongue was first expressed in written
characters—derived from the Phœnicians or independently invented—so
perfectly did these answer the purpose that the Hindoos styled their
alphabet “the writing of the gods.” The Sanscrit letters are still
preserved in the written language of the pure Hindoos, but in that of
the Mohammedan population have been replaced with the Arabic characters.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account