Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classicalQuackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
History
Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classical
Quackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
Classical literature -- History and criticism; Oriental literature -- History and criticism
From Italy, Plutarch returned to his native city, and there passed the
last twenty or thirty years of his life, happy in the society of his
wife, a paragon of good sense, economy, and virtue. Literature was
henceforth his pursuit; but believing it a duty to devote part of his
time to the public good, he accepted office from his fellow-townsmen,
and was finally made chief-magistrate of Chæronea. He tells us
with relish how his neighbors often laughed at his doing what they
considered beneath his dignity. When they wondered that so great a man
should carry fish from market in his own hands, he told them, “Why,
it’s for myself;” and when they found fault with him for personally
superintending the building of public edifices, he silenced them with
the reply, “This service is not for myself, but for my country.”
“The meaner the office you sustain,” said Plutarch, “the greater the
compliment you pay to the public.”
In his delightful retreat at Chæronea, Plutarch compiled from two
hundred and fifty authorities the work that has given him a niche
in the Temple of Fame—“Parallel Lives”—sparkling with interest and
animation, as it is underlaid by good judgment. His plan was to present
the biography of a distinguished Greek, follow it with that of some
Roman, and then critically compare the two characters. But the “Lives,”
as we have it, is not the complete work its author probably left at
his death, inasmuch as a number of biographies and parallels are
wanting. Though Plutarch’s passion for story-telling sometimes carries
him beyond the bounds of the probable, yet his work is an invaluable
storehouse; his capital literary portraits have stood the test of time,
and are still universally admired. The charms of a book in which are
recorded “the greatest characters and most admirable actions of the
human race” can never fade.
Among the best of Plutarch’s Parallels is his
COMPARISON OF DEMOSTHENES AND CICERO.
“Omitting an exact comparison of their respective faculties in
speaking, yet thus much seems fit to be said: That Demosthenes, to
make himself a master in rhetoric, applied all the faculties he
had, natural or acquired, wholly that way; that he far surpassed
in force and strength of eloquence all his contemporaries in
political and judicial speaking, in grandeur and majesty all the
panegyrical orators, and in accuracy and science all the logicians and
rhetoricians of his day: That Cicero was highly educated, and by his
diligent study became a most accomplished general scholar in all these
branches, having left behind him numerous philosophical treatises
of his own on Academic principles; as, indeed, even in his written
speeches, both political and judicial, we see him continually trying
to show his learning by the way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account