Illustrations of political economy, Volume 9 (of 9)Martineau, Harriet
General
Illustrations of political economy, Volume 9 (of 9)
Martineau, Harriet
Didactic fiction, English; Political fiction, English; Social problems -- Fiction
Six or seven different machines are employed in the production of
cotton-yarn from raw cotton. All but the last are called
“preparation machinery,” and one person waits upon each. The
office of this preparation machinery is to form the raw cotton
into a thick and tender thread, called a “roving.” The office of
the last machine is to twist and draw out the roving into a finer
and stronger thread: this operation is called “spinning,” and the
spun thread is “yarn.” This machine is called the “hand-mule.”
Hand-mules are worked in pairs, each pair requiring the head
spinner above-mentioned to direct its operation, and two or more
children to place the rovings in the machine, and piece the
threads that break.
The head spinner, though paid in proportion to the superiority of
his work, has always been the one to turn out; and his subordinates
must go with him of necessity, however averse they might be to do
so. It was not to be borne that the discontents of the comparatively
few should derange the whole manufacture, and deprive the many of
their bread; and nothing could be more natural than for some
expedient to be sought by which the masters and the subordinates
might be made independent of the head spinners. Twenty years ago,
attempts were made to invent some apparatus which might be attached
to the mule, and discharge the spinner’s task. The apparatus first
used was either too complex or too uncertain in its operation to
answer the purpose; and, as often as it failed, the spinners clapped
their hands, believed the manufacture more in their power than ever,
and advanced in their demands accordingly. They went somewhat too
far in 1824, when they refused very high wages, and drove the
Manchester capitalists to vigorous measures of self-defence. The
requisite talent was sought and found for the object required; and,
early in 1825, a patent for the “self-acting mule” was taken out,
nothing being wanting to its efficacy but the simplification which
time and practice were sure to bring, and which would lessen its
cost so as to qualify it for common adoption. No sooner had it been
set to work, and begun to gain reputation, than a great part of the
establishment where it was in use was destroyed by fire, and the
machine was not heard of for some months. As soon as it began to be
again attended to, so great a stagnation of trade took place, that
the spirit of the spinner was subdued: the master was unwilling to
mortify him in his distress, and all mention of the self-acting mule
was dropped. This was very hard upon the patentees, who had been
originally forced into the business, and had spent, not only much
time and pains, but a great deal of money on the invention. They
rightly supposed, however, that the head spinners would give them
their turn on the first opportunity. They went on improving and
improving their invention, while awaiting another strike on the
revival of trade. This happened at the close of 1829; and then
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account