Illustrations of the Croton AqueductTower, F. B. (Fayette Bartholomew)
History
Illustrations of the Croton Aqueduct
Tower, F. B. (Fayette Bartholomew)
Croton Aqueduct (N.Y.)
It was suggested that the hydraulic power here obtained, could be used
for manufacturing purposes, except that portion of it which would
be required for elevating the water to the reservoir. This plan of
supplying the city with water was objected to, because it could not
be accomplished except by an Act of the Legislature of New-Jersey as
well as that of New-York, and it was also questionable whether such
obstructions could be placed in navigable rivers without interfering
with the powers of Congress to regulate the commerce of the nation.
It was feared that in locking vessels through, the salt water would
become mingled with the fresh above the dam where a supply would be
taken for the city, to such a degree, that it would render it unfit
for domestic use. The quantity of land that would be overflowed by the
water set back by the dam, presented another objection. The space of
time that the tide would be sufficiently low to allow the wheels to
work in pumping water into the reservoir, would be entirely too short
to insure a supply. This objection was offered by Frederick Graff,
Esq., the superintendent of the Philadelphia Water Works, who stated
that although the dam on the Schuylkill River is raised 6 feet 6 inches
above the highest tides, the delay in pumping, occasioned by the tides,
averages seven hours out of the twenty-four; and in full moon tides,
from eight to nine hours.
The projector of this plan set forth many advantages which he thought
would arise from the construction of the dam, but the obstruction to
the navigation of the river, the destruction of the shad fishery, and
various objections besides those already mentioned, induced the Water
Commissioners to reject the idea of building a dam across the Hudson.
We have now gone over most of the preliminary steps which were taken
before deciding upon the source for a supply of water.--Having fixed
upon the Croton River as a stream possessing the requisite advantages
for a supply, questions naturally arose as to the manner in which it
should be conveyed to the city. The distance being about forty miles,
over a country extremely broken and uneven, and following a direction,
for a portion of this distance, parallel with the Hudson River,
encountering the streams which empty into it and form deep valleys in
their courses. It will be interesting to notice the different plans
which were suggested for forming a channel-way to conduct the water.
The following modes were presented:--a plain channel formed of earth,
like the ordinary construction of a canal feeder:--an open channel,
protected against the action of the current by masonry:--an arched
culvert or conduit, composed essentially of masonry; and iron pipes.
In deciding which of these modes should be adopted, it was necessary
to make a comparison among them as to their efficiency for conducting
the water in purity, and in the quantity required, their permanency as
structures, and their cost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account