Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre — John Shaqi
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
With a voice distinct from that of the living, so that none of you
can perceive the least manifestation of breathing, this personal form
tells you not to be afraid--that nothing will hurt you--to stand as
near as you please, and handle him that you may know whether or not he
is flesh and bones. You comply with the request, and find no material
substance. Now what would be your conclusion? Would you feel sure
that these matters were all the effect of your own fancy and that of
others? Can you produce a single instance out of all history, in which
so many persons were thus impressed, while in reality they saw and
heard nothing? But suppose further, that this Spectre informs you of
events which you cannot possibly know by other means, what then would
be the inference? “I make a distinction, says Doctor Johnson, between
what a man may experience by the mere strength of his imagination,
and what imagination cannot possibly produce.” Thus, suppose I should
think I saw a form and heard a voice cry, “Johnson, you are very
wicked--and unless you repent, you will certainly be punished;” my own
unworthiness is so deeply impressed on my mind, that I might imagine I
thus saw and heard, and therefore I should not believe that an external
communication had been made to me. But if a form should appear and a
voice should tell me that a particular man had died at a particular
hour--a fact which I had no apprehension of, nor any means of knowing,
and this fact, with all its circumstances, should afterwards be
unquestionably proved; I should in that case be persuaded that I had
supernatural intelligence imparted to me. By this it appears, that had
Doctor Johnson been an eye and ear witness of only a small part of what
is now to be related, he would have believed that he had seen the form
and heard the language of a Spectre. “He had a very philosophical mind,
says Mr. Boswell, and such a rational respect for testimony, as to make
him submit his understanding to what was authentically proved, though
he could not comprehend why it was so.”[9] And the same will be the
disposition of every pious and reasonable mind. But if you reject the
evidence of experience, the evidence of substantial testimony and the
evidence of predictions, where are you? On the billows of scepticism,
without a helm, and your lee shore is infidelity.
It is frequently asserted, and that by multitudes, that the true origin
of the following letters is a gross artifice. ASSERTED I say: for that
is all. Twenty-six years’ time they have had to look round, search and
prove that they are not mistaken. And for this purpose, means and pains
have not been wanting. Nothing however has yet transpired to make good
the assertion; but remarkable events have disproved it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account