Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
This, they say, is a great objection: a person from the invisible
state would never have conversed with the people in such an ordinary
style. But had she excelled in the _elegant_ or _sublime_, objection
would not have been silent. It would have been said that she was not
the person she professed to be: for the employment of that person had
never been the study of Sheridan or Longinus: on earth she was below
it, in heaven above it. The Spectre came not with the excellency of
speech, which man teaches, nor with the sublimity of those prophecies
which describe the rise and ruin of empires; for empires were not her
subject; and there was perfect propriety in her using such language as
would subserve two of her designs: which were to manifest who she was,
and to render herself as familiar as possible to those common people
with whom she conversed. Accordingly her mention of certain articles of
property which she had left, was by no means an ultimate design, as she
herself declared; but this, and her reasonable disposal of them, were
more clearly to convince her family that she had been their daughter
and sister. For the same reason the features of her face were observed
to be like those of the person she professed to be, by some who knew
her in her life time. And though her voice had no indication of breath
and was inimitably distinct from any voice of the living, yet it had
the same sound which she had uttered in her last hours, as they, who
attended her in her last sickness have testified. Sometimes a part of
the company could understand her words without the least difficulty;
while others with advantages of hearing, every way equal, perceived
only a sound, without the least articulation whatever. Thus the men who
were with Paul at the time of his conversion, heard a voice, but saw no
man, and they saw the light, but heard not the articulate voice of the
speaker.
Such was the various experience of the people on these occasions.
Some of them heard and understood plainly, but saw nothing: others
heard a voice, but no speaking voice: others again saw a light, but
no person: while they had no impediments natural or accidental; yet
far the greater number heard the words distinctly, and clearly saw a
personal form. And the very same persons, who could not see, nor hear
intelligibly at one time, would at another time, and even at a greater
distance see, hear and understand without the least difficulty: while
others of the company, who had clearly seen and understood at the
previous interview, could now only see a light and hear a sound.
It was to render herself familiar that she frequently introduced
herself, as we do, by the token of knocking.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account