Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
The Jews, besides their public code of revelation, had their Urim
and Thummim for the particulars of duty. Is it certain? Is it even
rational to suppose that the few answers of that oracle mentioned in
the scriptures, are the only ones ever communicated? Prophets, too,
were sent to manifest the particulars of duty, and angels, some of whom
_might be_ the spirits of just men. And we have no reason to doubt
but Moses was a Spectre when he conversed with Christ on the Holy
Mount; notwithstanding that old fiction of his resurrection, which has
dishonored the antiquities of Josephus.
Now the question is, what person ever yet demonstrated that no such
occasional revelation was ever wanted in any hour since the completion
of the scriptures? Certainly this completion never precluded spectral
missions in the view of the christian fathers. And their continuation
has been the constant faith of christians in general, down to this day
of deism. And the war of the deists against this opinion is easily
accounted for: because the admission of Spectres is the admission of
miracle; and the admission of occasional revelation, brings a question
to their door which would be a troublesome neighbor. _Why then should
not a revelation be needful for the public?_ Great is their obligation
to modern christians for their assistance in this warfare. It may be
asked, if these missions have been thus continued, why have they
generally been attended with so few witnesses? But if there be evidence
enough for him, or those who are interested in the message, it is
sufficient for their purpose, whether others believe it or not.
When David was told by the Urim that the men of Keilah would deliver
him into the hand of Saul, no person appears to have been present but
Abiather; but if the oracle was attended with the evidence described by
Josephus, there was evidence enough for the purpose of David and his
men, whether five other persons in the whole nation believed it or not.
After all, it is not our duty to expect apparitions, for they never
come to gratify curiosity; nor to pray for their coming, unless our
case be peculiar as that of Manoah; nor to entertain the idea that
their speaking to us, would make a more durable impression than the
preaching of the living. Such conduct and apprehensions are erroneous,
and expose us to greater delusion. Our Lord has expressly taught us
that, if we believe not Moses and the prophets, neither shall we
be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. And accordingly the
affectionate and persuasive addresses of the Spectre in this place,
which drew tears from every eye, had no happy, durable influence on the
unregenerate character in a single instance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account