Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
It was necessary that religion should appear in all her conduct
and conversation, otherwise her profession would have been justly
suspected. But on that Lord’s day morning, mentioned in several
testimonies, she did not say to the people, _Tarry and hear me_. No,
but “Retire to your homes, read the bible, pray and keep the day
holy.”[55] That is to say, attend to those ample and most suitable
means of grace which God has appointed for you in his written word.
The preaching of the gospel was not her design; but she had other
designs which appropriate the sentence, “I am not to be trifled with.”
In some old fashioned minds, her familiar conversation may excite
the suspicion of necromancy and divination, by a _familiar_ spirit,
so plainly forbidden in the law of Moses: and then doubtless Mrs.
Butler must bear the accusation. But there is no evidence that this
angel conversed more familiarly with her than with others who were
never suspected. She conversed familiarly with all those who had much
conversation with her.
The ancient idea of a familiar spirit appears not to have been obtained
from the familiar conversation of any person with a spirit, (though
sometimes the inquirer might be deceived by the artificial resemblance
of it) but from the opinion that certain persons had a spirit foreign
to their own, residing in them and uttering oracles from their
bodies.[56] These persons were a sort of ventriloquists. Their conduct
is described by Rollin in his account of the Grecian Oracles. The
speech of their familiar spirit was imagined to proceed, not from the
lips of any person, but from a part of their own bodies, in some manner
artificially swollen. This is confirmed by their very name _Abefeth_,
in the Hebrew language, which has the signification of swelling. The
familiar spirit itself was called _Afeb_, which is the same noun in the
singular number. The swollen part and the familiar spirit, which was
imagined to reside in it, had one name. “Divine unto me by the Afeb,”
said Saul, 1 Sam. 28: 8. Divine unto me by the _swelling_, and bring me
up whom I shall name unto thee. But it does not appear that the woman
had any time for divination. She saw Samuel unexpectedly, and cried out
for fear:[57] and Samuel, instead of being familiar with her, never
spake a single word to her. Now it is not even pretended that any such
token of Afeb or necromancy, have appeared among us.
Doubtless this wickedness among the ancients, was for the most part
legerdemain,[58] and their predictions always uncertain, as appears
not only from their ambiguity, but from the public estimation of some
oracles in preference to others, and of the Delphic oracle above all
the rest.
From the observations now made, we learn the criminality of witchcraft
or legerdemain, for there is no essential difference between them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account