Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
The hairs of the head and the smallest animalculæ are numbered; so are
all events. Small events by connection are frequently great events. If
therefore, the purposes for which a spirit is said to appear, are as
small and trivial as can be conceived of, it would by no means follow
that the message did not come from the invisible state. That which
appears very trivial in our view, may appear vastly important in the
view of those seven eyes which survey the whole system of Providence,
and destroy the wisdom of the wise.
ARG. 4. “Death is as great a change as that of our birth. And is it
not as improbable that a man should visibly return after death, as
that he should return from a state of manhood, to that which preceded
his birth?” That is to say; Is it not as improbable that a species
of miracle should take place, the existence of which has been taught
and believed in all ages and nations, and is the manifest lesson of
the Scriptures; as that a species of miracle should take place, which
nobody ever believed or heard of?
_Is it not as improbable that a man should rise from the dead at the
last day, as that he should return from a state of manhood to that
which preceded his birth._
This question of the infidel demands some attention, as well as the
question in view.
ARG. 5. “There is a strong objection against the probability of
Spectres, which is sufficient to prove that they are not intelligent
creatures; or at least, that they possess so small a degree of
intelligence, that they are unqualified to act with prudence, to
propose any end to themselves, or use the proper means to accomplish
that end. Ghosts often appear in order to discover some crime; but
they never appear to a magistrate, or person in authority, but to some
illiterate clown, who happens to live near the place where the crime
was perpetrated: to some person who has no connection with the affair
at all, and who, in general, is the most improper in the world for
making the discovery.”
In Glanville’s Saducismus Triumphatus, we have the following story:--
“James Haddock, a farmer, was married to Eleanor Welsh, by whom he had
a son. After the death of Haddock, his wife married one Davis, and both
agreed to defraud the son by the former marriage, of a lease bequeathed
to him by his father. Upon this the ghost of Haddock appeared to one
Francis Tavernor, the servant of Lord Chichester, and desired him to
go to Eleanor Welsh and inform her that it was the will of her former
husband that the son should enjoy the lease. Tavernor did not at
first execute this commission, but he was continually haunted by the
apparition in the most hideous shapes, which even threatened to tear
him in pieces, till at last he delivered the message. Now had this
Spectre the least common sense, it would have appeared first to Eleanor
Welsh and her husband, Davis, and frightened them into compliance at
once, and not have kept poor Tavernor in such constant disquietude, who
had no concern in the matter.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account