Impressionist painting: its genesis and developmentDewhurst, Wynford
History
Impressionist painting: its genesis and development
Dewhurst, Wynford
Artists -- Portraits; Impressionism (Art)
By thus working in the open both Constable and Turner, together with
their French followers, were able to realise upon canvas a closer
verisimilitude to the varying moods of nature than had been attempted
before. By avoiding artificially darkened studios they were able to
study the problems of light with an actuality impossible under a glass
roof. They were in fact children of the sun, and through its worship
they evolved an entirely new school of picture-making. The Modern
Impressionist, too, is a worshipper of light, and is never happier than
when attempting to fix upon his canvas some beautiful effect of
sunshine, some exquisite gradation of atmosphere. Who better than Turner
can teach the use and practice of value and tone? In triumph he fixed
those fleeting mists upon his immortal canvases, immortal unhappily only
so long as bitumen, mummy, and other pigment abominations will allow.
The technical methods of the French Impressionists and of the early
English group vary but little. The modern method of placing side by side
upon the canvas spots, streaks, or dabs of more or less pure colour,
following certain defined scientific principles, was made habitual use
of by Turner. Both Constable and Turner worked pure white in impasto
throughout their canvases, high light and shadow equally, long before
the advent of the Frenchmen.
An example of this was to be seen in a large painting by Constable hung
in the Royal Academy Winter Exhibition of 1903. _The Opening of Waterloo
Bridge_, exhibited in 1832, was declared by the artist’s enemies to have
been painted with his palette-knife. Almost the whole of the canvas,
especially the foreground, is dragged over by a full charged brush of
pure white, which, catching the uneven surface of the underlying dry
impasto work, produces a simple but successful illusion of brilliant
vibrating light.
This work was not well received by the contemporary press and public. It
was regarded as a bad joke, became celebrated as a snowstorm, compared
with Berlin wool-work (a favourite simile which Mr. Henley has recently
applied to Burne-Jones), and was derided as the product of a disordered
brain. Seventy years have barely sufficed for its full appreciation.
By a curious coincidence Bonington’s _Boulogne Fishmarket_ was hung
almost exactly opposite in the same Winter Exhibition. This canvas must
have had an enormous influence with Manet, its blond harmony and rich
flat values within a distinct general tone being a distinguishing
feature of the great Frenchman’s style.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account