In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the SaharaPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
Africa, North -- Description and travel
That this disproportionate system, which grants suffrage to ten per cent
of the population and leaves ninety per cent of the inhabitants without a
voice in governmental affairs, should be provocative of deep discontent
among the natives is hardly surprising. Far from unifying the population,
it has but served to encourage racial hatred and political prejudice, for
the “citizens,” native and naturalized, consider themselves immensely
superior to the unfranchised, who bitterly resent the subordinate
position that has been allotted them in the land which their fathers
ruled for twelve hundred years. Looking eastward, the Algerians see
their fellow-Moslems in Tunisia enjoying a considerable measure of
autonomy, somewhat vague and limited, it is true, but an autonomy of
sorts nevertheless. On the west they see the Moroccans, with whom they
are closely allied racially, religiously, and historically, under a
French protectorate, but a protectorate so mild and beneficent as to be
scarcely felt. The bey of Tunis still sits on the throne of his fathers
in the Palace of the Bardo; the sultan of Morocco is still the titular
head of the Shereefian Empire; but in Algeria all power is vested in the
governor-general, an alien and a non-Moslem, and the flag which flies
over the country from Lalla Maghnia to the Mjerda is the flag of France.
The cause of this discrimination must be sought in history. The French
came into Algeria as avenging conquerors during an age when European
nations recognized only three methods of dealing with native populations:
extinction, expulsion, and repression. At the time of the conquest
France was still swayed by Napoleonic ideals, her military men were in
the saddle, and the numerous native uprisings, particularly that led by
Abd-el-Kader, had convinced her that she was standing on the crust of
a volcano. Hence, in formulating her Algerian policy, she decided on
repression; she determined to use the mailed fist without the velvet
glove. Everywhere, even on the plains, where resistance was slight and
conquest was easy, the natives were dispossessed. The land was allotted
to Frenchmen or to those natives, comparatively few in number, who were
able to qualify as French “citizens” and consented to take the oath of
allegiance to France. Those who had fought for their fatherland, who had
resisted the invaders, were deprived of their property, the villages were
depopulated, broad areas of the country were laid waste. In the cities
the mosques were in many cases desecrated or handed over to the religious
orders to be used for what the Moslems considered idolatrous worship.
Some of them have never been restored to their owners. The country was
administered—and still is to a large extent—primarily for the benefit
of Frenchmen. Those Algerians only have prospered who have entered the
French army or government service, and formed affiliations which all but
cut them off from their fellow-countrymen. Though in the ninety-odd
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account