In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara — John Shaqi
In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the SaharaPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
Africa, North -- Description and travel
Most of us think of Morocco as a treeless, semi-arid, almost level land,
yet it has vast forests of oak and pine, several rivers comparable with
the Thames or the Hudson, and in the spring its prairies and hill-slopes
are carpeted with countless varieties of wild flowers. Far from being
level, it is a highly mountainous country; the Moroccan Atlas has a
greater average height than the Alps, and at least one of its peaks is
higher than any mountain in the United States outside of Alaska.
We ourselves went to war in ’98 to end the intolerable rule of Spain in
the Western Hemisphere, yet the propaganda skilfully disseminated from
Madrid and Paris has blinded us to the fact that Abd-el-Krim and his
mountaineers of the Riff were fighting for precisely the same reason for
which the Cubans fought—to throw off the yoke of Spanish tyranny and
cruelty.
Because in the geographies of our school-days large portions of North
Africa were painted a speckled yellow, and because of the pictures of
sand-dunes reproduced in certain magazines, we habitually picture the
Sahara as a trackless waste of orange sand, on which grows no living
thing, little realizing that it is broken by mile-high mountain ranges
and dotted with oases, some of them as large as a New England State,
which support thousands of inhabitants and millions of date-palms.
Basing our idea on motion-pictures made in Hollywood, and on novels of
the desert school of fiction, we imagine sheikhs—and for heaven’s sake
pronounce it _shakes_ instead of _sheeks_!—as romantic, picturesque,
debonair gentlemen with chivalrous instincts and charming manners,
whereas candor compels me to assert that most of them are blackguardly
ruffians, lustful, cruel, vindictive, ignorant, debased, as filthy of
mind as of body.
We have long accepted as gospel the assertion that the British are the
only really successful colonizers in the world; the French colonial we
have pictured as a miserable being who spends his days in a hammock,
sipping absinthe, reading “La Vie Parisienne,” and counting the hours
until he can return to _la belle France_. Yet, in the space of a single
generation, these miserable and inefficient beings have in Africa alone
conquered and consolidated and civilized a colonial empire greater in
area than the United States and all of its possessions put together.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account