In the Dead of Night: A Novel. Volume 1 (of 3)Speight, T. W. (Thomas Wilkinson)
General
In the Dead of Night: A Novel. Volume 1 (of 3)
Speight, T. W. (Thomas Wilkinson)
English fiction -- 19th century
“You know, Lionel, that my love is yours always—that it has been yours
for a long long time,” said Edith, in accents that trembled a little in
spite of herself. “But I never received any letter from you after that
last one dated from some far-away town in America.”
“No letter!” exclaimed Lionel. “Not one explaining my reasons for
releasing you from your engagement?”
“Never a single line, Lionel.”
“But I gave the letter into your uncle’s hands,” returned Lionel. “He
promised faithfully that he would give it you.”
“He did not give it me,” answered Edith.
“Perhaps he kept it back because he thought it better that I should not
see it.”
“He had no right to do anything of the kind,” said Lionel, sternly.
“The letter was sacredly entrusted to him, and ought as sacredly to
have been delivered to you.
“Lionel, my uncle is no longer with us,” said Edith, gently. “You and I
are together again. That redeems all. Let us never say another word
about the letter.”
“What a villain, what a mean wretch, you must have thought me,” cried
Lionel impulsively, “to break off my engagement without assigning you
any reason! Without even a single word of explanation!”
“I thought you nothing of the kind,” said Edith, with decision. “I knew
you too well not to feel sure that you must have good and sufficient
reasons for acting as you did. Although you did not tell me what those
reasons were—whatever may have been my disappointment at your
silence—my faith in you never wavered.”
“But when weeks and months passed away, and you never heard from me——”
“I felt then that all was over between us; felt it in a despairing,
hopeless kind of way. But I cherished no resentment against you—none.”
“But surely your uncle and aunt had some explanation to offer?”
“They told me that, through the failure of a bank, you had lost the
whole of your fortune, and that, consequently, you had resigned all
pretensions to my hand.”
“And you?”
“I thought that you might have called to see me; or, at least, have
written to me. I could not understand why, if you still continued to
care for me, you should choose to give me up simply because you had
lost your fortune.”
“You could not understand it?”
“Indeed I could not. And I fail to understand it now. If you were poor,
I was rich. What greater happiness could I have than to endow you with
my plenty? When I gave you my love, it meant that I gave you everything
I could call mine.”
“You look at the question from a woman’s point of view, Edith: I, from
a man’s.”
“If I had lost my fortune as you lost yours, would you have given me
up?” asked Edith.
“Certainly not.”
“Nor I you. With me, to love and to be loved is everything. In
comparison with that all else is as nothing.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account