In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her LoverOliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
General
In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her Lover
Oliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
Fiction
Mount had the distinction of being entailed; it was not a large estate
nor a valuable one, and it had been deeply mortgaged when the present
Mr. Mountford, St. John by name, came of age. But he had married an
heiress, who had liberated his acres and added greatly to his social
importance. The first Mrs. Mountford had died early, leaving only one
daughter, and at the same time her entire fortune in the hands of her
husband, to do with it what he pleased. These were the days when public
opinion was very unanimous as to the impropriety and unnecessariness of
female rights of any kind, and everybody applauded Mrs. Mountford for
resisting all conditions, and putting herself and her child unreservedly
in her husband’s hands. He had re-married two years after her death, but
unfortunately had succeeded in obtaining only another girl from
unpropitious fate. His first wife’s daughter was Anne, universally
considered as the natural heiress of the considerable fortune which,
after clearing the estate, had remained of her mother’s money, and which
her father had kept scrupulously ‘in a napkin,’ like the churl in the
parable, neither increasing nor diminishing the store. The other
daughter was Rose. Such was the household at Mount in the days when this
history begins. The reigning Mrs. Mountford was a good sort of easy
woman who did not count for much. She was one of the Codringtons of
Carrisford--a ‘very good family’ of the same class as the Mountfords.
Nothing could be better than the connections on both sides--or duller.
But the girls were different. It is very hard to say why the girls
should have been different--perhaps because the present new wave of life
has distinctly affected the girls more than any other class of society.
At all events, the point was indisputable. Anne perhaps might have taken
after her mother, who was of an entirely new stock, not a kind which had
ever before been ingrafted on the steady-going family tree. She had come
out of a race partly mercantile, partly diplomatic; her grandfather had
been Spanish; it was even suspected that one of her ancestors had been a
Jew. All kinds of out-of-the-way sources had furnished the blood which
had been destined to mix with the slow current in the Mountford veins;
and probably Anne had inherited certain bizarre qualities from this
jumble. But Rose had no such mixed antecedents. There was not a drop of
blood in her veins that did not belong to the county, and it was
difficult to see how she could have ‘taken after’ her sister Anne, as
was sometimes suggested, in respect to peculiarities which had come to
Anne from her mother; but if she did not take after Anne, who _did_ she
take after, as Mrs. Mountford often demanded?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account