In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her LoverOliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
General
In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her Lover
Oliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
Fiction
as she always did; for to refuse Girton to Rose would have been more
difficult than to neglect Anne’s entreaties. For, though Anne was the
eldest sister, it was Rose who was the princess royal and reigned over
the whole demesne.
This desire of the higher education on the part of Rose, who still said
‘pon chour,’ and was not at all certain that two and two always make
four, would have been enough to keep the house in commotion if there had
not occurred just then one of the family troubles appropriate to girls
after so many that could not be called feminine. It has already been
said that the rector of the parish had a son who had ‘gone to the bad.’
He had two other sons, rocks ahead for the young ladies at Mount. Indeed
these two young men were such obvious dangers that Mrs. Mountford had
taken precautions against them while Rose was still in her cradle. One
was a curate, his father’s probable successor; but as the living was in
Mr. Mountford’s hands, and it was always possible that someone else
might be preferred to Charley, some Mountford connection who had a
nearer claim, that prospect did not count for much. The other was
nothing at all, a young man at Oxford, not yet launched upon life. But
fortunately these young men, though very familiar in the house, were not
handsome nor dangerously attractive, and this peril is one which must
always be encountered in the country, even by people of much higher
pretensions than the Mountfords. The first trouble, however, did not
come from this obvious quarter, though it came through there. It was not
one of the Ashleys; but it was a person still less satisfactory. One of
the curate’s friends arrived suddenly on a visit in the late summer--a
young Mr. Douglas, a barrister, which sounds well enough; but not one of
the Douglasses who have ever been heard of. They did not find this out
for some time, imagining fondly that he belonged, at a distance perhaps,
to the Morton family, or to the house of Queensberry, or at least to
Douglasses in Scotland, of whom it could be said that they were of
Lanarkshire or Selkirkshire or some other county. Indeed, it was not
until the whole household was thrown into commotion by a morning call
from Mr. Douglas, who asked for Mr. Mountford, and boldly demanded from
him the hand of Anne, that it burst upon them that he was a Douglas of
nowhere at all. He had been very well educated, and he was at the bar;
but when he was asked what branch of the Douglasses he belonged to, he
answered ‘None,’ with a smile. ‘I have no relations,’ he said. Relations
can be dispensed with. There is no harm in being without them; but a
family was indispensable, and he belonged to nobody. It was just like
Anne, however, not to care. She did not in the least care, nor did she
see any harm in her lover’s countyless condition. And when Mr. Mountford
politely declined the honour of an alliance with this Mr. Douglas of
nowhere at all, she did not hesitate to say that she entirely disagreed
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account