Index Expurgatorius Anglicanus: Or, a descriptive catalogue of the principal books printed or published in England, which have been suppressed, or burnt by the common hangman, or censured, or for which the authors, printers, or publishers have been prosecuted — John Shaqi
Index Expurgatorius Anglicanus: Or, a descriptive catalogue of the principal books printed or published in England, which have been suppressed, or burnt by the common hangman, or censured, or for which the authors, printers, or publishers have been prosecutedHart, W. H. (William Henry)
History
Index Expurgatorius Anglicanus: Or, a descriptive catalogue of the principal books printed or published in England, which have been suppressed, or burnt by the common hangman, or censured, or for which the authors, printers, or publishers have been prosecuted
Hart, W. H. (William Henry)
Prohibited books -- England -- Bibliography
A book presenting a curious view of the habits and manners of the
young men of family and fashion in the reign of Elizabeth. It is
reprinted in the Miscellanea Antiqua Anglicana. Upon a motion made
by Mr. Norton in the House of Commons on February 4th, 1580/81,
stating that this book was "done and procured" by Mr. Arthur Hall,
a member of that House: it was resolved that the Sergeant at Arms
be forthwith sent to apprehend Mr. Hall, and the printer was also
to be sent for; and accordingly on the 6th February Mr. Hall was
brought to the bar and admitted the offence. On the 14th February
it was resolved that he should be committed to the Tower for six
months, and so much longer as until he should willingly make a
retractation; that he be fined 500 marks, and be expelled the House
of Commons. (Vide Commons' Journals, vol. 1, pp. 122, 124, 125,
126, 132, 136.)
13.
The Discoverie of a Gaping Gulf whereinto England is like to be
swallowed by another French marriage, if the Lord forbid not the
banes, by letting her Majestie see the sin and punishment thereof.
Mense Augusti Anno 1579.
According to Camden[1] the Queen was much incensed at this book, in
which those of the Council who favoured the marriage are taxed as
ungrateful to their Prince and Country; the Queen herself (in the
midst of several flattering expressions) is glanced at as unlike
herself; the Duke of Anjou slandered with unworthy reproaches; the
French nation odiously defamed; and the marriage itself, in regard
of the difference of religion, (as of the daughter of God with
a son of Antichrist) with virulent words condemned, as profane,
dangerous to the Church, and destructive to the Commonwealth; and
this proved out of the Holy Scriptures, miserably wrested. Neither
would the Queen be persuaded that the author of the book had any
other intent but to procure the hatred of her subjects against her,
(who had always no less regard of the love of her people than she
had of her own authority, and as Princes use to do, made it her
chief care to preserve her reputation) and privately to open a gap
for some prodigious innovation; considering that the writer had
not so much as mentioned the security of the Queen and realm, or
prevention of dangers to either, and that the States of the Realm
had before with all earnestness besought her to marry, as the most
assured remedy against the threatening mischiefs. These things
she declared by public proclamation,[2] wherein having condemned
the author of the book as a publisher of sedition, she highly
commended the Duke of Anjou's good affection towards her and the
Protestant religion, and expressed her resentment that so great an
injury should be offered to so noble a Prince, and one that had so
well deserved, who had desired nothing to be altered either in the
commonwealth or religion: and withal, she commended Simier, the
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account