Coudroy on that subject quoted, 25. Bastiat's account of the reception of that work, 27. Notice of the Harmonies, 27, 28, 29. List of chapters intended to complete 2d vol. of, 30, note. Holland, usual rate of interest in, said to be under 3 per cent., 302. Population of, doubles in 100 years, 404. I. Icarie, voyage en, Socialist work referred to, 205. Institute, Bastiat named a member of, 14. Interest of Capital, Proudhon's error regarding, 158. All the power of the Church unable to enforce prohibition of, 480. Isolation, in the state of, our wants exceed our powers, 98; and the gain of one may be the loss of another, 117. Italy, usual rate of interest in, said to be 6 per cent., 302. J. Johnson, Dr, his opinions on free will and necessity quoted, 473, note. Journal des Économistes, Bastiat's first contribution to, 13. Justice et Fraternité, pamphlet by Bastiat against the Socialists, 22. K. Kepler referred to, 68. L. Labour, the assertion that all wealth comes from labour combated, 88. Utility communicated by nature, by labour, and oftener by a combination of both, ib. To produce utility, action of labour in an inverse ratio to that of nature, ib. As used by Economists, a vague term, and more extended meaning given to it in this work, 92. Distinction between productive and unproductive, has led to error, ib. Distinction between productive and unproductive labour rejected, 156, 157. Effort a better term than labour, 158. Labour cannot serve as a measure of value, 171. Unskilled labour the best for making a comparison, ib. In exchanging present for anterior labour, the advantage is on the side of present labour, 178. The opposite phenomenon sometimes manifests itself, 179. Laissez-faire, doctrine of, explained, 48, 448, 449. Lamennais, M. de, his opinions on the principle of population combated, 408, 409. Landed Property. The idea of value gives rise to that of property, 249. Confusion caused by Economists mistaking utility for value, 250. Property represented as monopoly, 250, 251. Is not a monopoly, 251. Opinions of English Economists on this subject-Adam Smith quoted, 252; Buchanan quoted, 252, 253; Ricardo's opinion, ib.; M'Culloch's views, 253; Scrope and Senior quoted, ib.; opinions of Mill and Malthus referred to, 254; Scialoja and Florez Estrada quoted, ib. French Economists-M. Say quoted, ib.; Blanqui and J. Garnier quoted, 255, 256. Opinions of Socialists and Communists-M. Considérant quoted, 257; Proudhon quoted, 260. These opinions controverted, 260-273. Recapitulation, 273.