KANT'S CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT Translated With Introduction And Notes By J. H. Bernard, D.D., D.C.L. Bishop Of Ossory CONTENTS Editor's Introduction xi Preface 1 Introduction 7 I. Of the division of Philosophy 7 II. Of the realm of Philosophy in general 11 III. Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole 14 IV. Of Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori 17 V. The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgement 20 VI. Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature 27 VII. Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature 30 VIII. Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature 35 IX. Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgement 39 First Part.�Critique of the Aesthetical Judgement 43 First Division.�Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement 45 First Book.�Analytic of the Beautiful 45 First Moment of the judgement of taste, according to quality 45 � ?1. The judgement of taste is aesthetical 45 � ?2. The satisfaction which determines the judgement of taste is disinterested 46 � ?3. The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest 48 � ?4. The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest 50 � ?5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction 53vi Second Moment of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity 55 � ?6. The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction 55 � ?7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic 57 � ?8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective 59 � ?9. Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object 63 Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein 67 � 10. Of purposiveness in general 67 � 11. The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) 69 � 12. The judgement of taste rests on a priori grounds 70 � 13. The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion 72 � 14. Elucidation by means of examples 73 � 15. The judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection 77 � 16. The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure 81 � 17. Of the Ideal of Beauty 84 Fourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object 91 � 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is 91 � 19. The subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgement of taste is conditioned 92