Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the SiouxBrady, Cyrus Townsend
History
Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the Sioux
Brady, Cyrus Townsend
Dakota Indians -- Wars; Indians of North America -- Wars -- 1866-1895
“For some reason Custer, one of the most splendid soldiers that ever
lived, hated General Belknap, the Secretary of War. He was a good hater,
too. When General Belknap was imprisoned and undergoing trial Custer
wrote that he knew of certain things regarding the appointment of
post-traders on the upper Missouri River, which things the prosecution
thought were what they needed to insure conviction. As a matter of fact,
Custer did not know anything. He had heard disappointed men who had
failed to get said post-traderships curse Belknap and say that they knew
Belknap had sold the traderships to the appointees. It was not so.
Belknap had given these appointments to certain able Iowa politicians
for their friends, in order to secure their influence in the next
campaign for United States Senator from Iowa, as he had determined to
try for a senatorship from his state, viz., Iowa.
“It was entirely within his own right to make these appointments and
there was really nothing wrong in doing so. Of course the disappointed
applicants were furious, and especially certain men who had served with
Belknap during the Civil War and who thought they had a claim on him.
They could not tell lies fast enough about Belknap and especially to
Custer, who was thoroughly honest and believed what they said. This was
what Custer thought he knew.
“Custer was summoned to Washington of course. When he was questioned by
the House Committee of prosecution it was apparent that he did not know
anything. His evidence was all hearsay and not worth a tinker’s dam. The
President—General Grant—was indignant at Custer’s statements regarding
Belknap, which turned out to be all hearsay.... The President directed
General Sherman not to permit Custer to take the field against Sitting
Bull—undoubtedly to punish him.
“You will recall that Belknap was—in a sort of Scotch verdict way, ‘Not
proven, my lord’—acquitted. It was only upon the strong, insistent and
urgent request of General Sheridan to General Sherman—the then
Commanding General of the Army—that the President finally said that if
General Sheridan regarded Custer’s services of great importance in the
campaign, Sherman might authorize Sheridan to permit him to join his
regiment and serve under General Terry, who was appointed to command the
expedition. Sherman wired Sheridan what the President said, and Sheridan
at once applied for Custer as in his opinion ‘necessary.’[67]
“I was in Europe at the time of the Custer disaster, and on my return to
General Sheridan’s headquarters I saw all the correspondence in the
case.”
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account