Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the SiouxBrady, Cyrus Townsend
History
Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the Sioux
Brady, Cyrus Townsend
Dakota Indians -- Wars; Indians of North America -- Wars -- 1866-1895
imputes to Custer a character void of every soldierly and manly
quality. With such an one discussion would be useless.
Upon the discussion itself, which is presented in the narrative and
in the appendix, I have little to say. In the opening paragraph of
the appendix, you say: “I presume the problem ... will never be
authoritatively settled, and that men will continue to differ upon
these questions until the end of time.”
In other words, the charge of disobedience can never be proved. The
proof does not exist. The evidence in the case forever lacks the
principal witness whose one and only definite order was to take his
regiment and go “in pursuit of the Indians whose trail was
discovered by Major Reno a few days since.” They were the objective;
they were to be located and their escape prevented. That was
Custer’s task. All the details were left, and necessarily left, to
his discretion. All else in the order of June 22d conveys merely the
“views” of the commander to be followed “unless you should see
sufficient reasons for departing from them.” The argument that
Custer disobeyed this order seems to resolve itself into two main
forms. One is trying to read into the order a precision and a
peremptory character which are not there and which no ingenuity can
put there, and to empty it of a discretion which is there and is
absolute; the other is in assuming or asserting that Custer departed
from General Terry’s views without “sufficient reasons.” And this
line of argument rests in part upon the imputation to Custer of a
motive and intent which was evil throughout, and in part upon what
his critic, in the light of later knowledge and the vain regrets of
hindsight, thinks he ought to have done, and all in utter ignorance
of Custer’s own views of the conditions in which, when he met them,
he was to find his own reasons for whatever he did or did not do.
Under that order, it was Custer’s views of the conditions when they
confronted him that were to govern his actions, whether they
contravened General Terry’s views or not. If in the presence of the
actual conditions, in the light of his great experience and
knowledge in handling Indians, he deemed it wise to follow the
trail, knowing it would reach them, and deeming that so to locate
them would be the best way to prevent their escape, then he obeyed
that order just as exactly as if, thinking otherwise, he had gone
scouting southward where they were not, and neither Terry nor he
expected them to be.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account