Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United StatesLauber, Almon Wheeler
History
Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United States
Lauber, Almon Wheeler
Indians of North America; Indians, Treatment of -- United States; Slavery -- United States; Thesis (Ph. D.)
[1029] Poore, _The Federal and State Constitutions. Colonial Charters_,
etc., ii, pp. 1407, 1408.
[1030] Trott, _Laws of the British Plantations in America_, etc., p. 17.
[1031] Ramage, _Local Government and Free Schools in South Carolina_,
p. 12, in _Johns Hopkins University Studies_, i.
[1032] _The Statutes at Large of South Carolina_, vii, pp. 364–365.
[1033] Hening, _op. cit._, i, p. 410.
[1034] _William and Mary College Quarterly_, vi, p. 215; Hening, _op.
cit._, ii, p. 155.
[1035] Hening, _op. cit._, ii, p. 260.
[1036] _Ibid._, ii, p. 283.
[1037] _Ibid._, ii, p. 491. The testimony of the Reverend Hugh Jones,
chaplain of the Virginia assembly, shows that the colonists, even
after such legislative action, did not approve of the baptizing of
Indians and negroes as they thought it made them proud and not so
good servants. Jones, however, declared that these objections could
be easily refuted “if the persons be sensible, good and understand
English, and have been taught (or are willing to learn) the principles
of Christianity and if they be kept to the observance of it afterward,
for Christianizing encourages and orders them to become more humble and
better servants and not worse than when they were heathen.” Jones, _The
Present State of Virginia_, in Sabin’s _Reprints_, No. 5, p. 70.
[1038] Trott, _Laws of the British Plantations in America_, etc., p.
142.
[1039] The parish register of St. Peters, New Kent County, Virginia,
1680–1787. pp. 53 and 64, mentions the deaths of two Indian slaves in
1722 and 1723, but records no births or marriages.
[1040] _Archives of Maryland_, xiii, p. 505.
[1041] _Ibid._, xix, p. 32.
[1042] Bacon, _Laws of Maryland_.
[1043] _Ibid._
[1044] Trott, _op. cit._, p. 257.
[1045] Morgan, _Slavery in New York_, in _Historic New York_, i, p. 8.
[1046] _New York Colonial Documents_, iii, p. 415.
[1047] Brodhead, _op. cit._, first edition, ii, p. 486. This act merely
confirmed previous legislation in 1680.
[1048] _Ibid._, first edition, ii, p. 509. This confirmed the
legislation of the previous year.
[1049] _Ibid._, first edition, ii, p. 510.
[1050] _New York Colonial Documents_, iv, p. 510.
[1051] Morgan, _op. cit._, in _Historic New York_, ii, p. 20; _Laws of
New York_, edition of 1752, p. 69.
[1052] Morgan, _op. cit._, in _Historic New York_, ii, p. 20.
[1053] Bolton, _History of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the
County of Westchester_, p. 228.
[1054] _Ibid._, p. 250.
[1055] _Ibid._, p. 264. The slaves in New York, as in other colonies,
did not favor giving up their Sundays to religious instruction and
observances, for they preferred to hunt and fish on this, the only day
which they had to themselves. _Ibid._, pp. 62–63.
[1056] Shurtleff, _Records of the Governor and Company of Massachusetts
Bay_, v, p. 136.
[1057] Mayhew, _Indian Converts_, p. 194.
[1058] _Ibid._, pp. 202, 222, 257.
[1059] _Plymouth Colony Records_, ii, pp. 103–104; _Medford Historical
Register_, iii, No. 3, p. 121.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account