Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United StatesLauber, Almon Wheeler
History
Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United States
Lauber, Almon Wheeler
Indians of North America; Indians, Treatment of -- United States; Slavery -- United States; Thesis (Ph. D.)
The Rhode Island authorities also limited the bondage of Indians to
a period of years. On May 18, 1652, the colony passed a law “that
no black mankind or white” should be “forced by covenant, bond or
otherwise, to serve any man or his assignees longer than ten years,
or until they became twenty-four years of age, if they be taken in
under fourteen, from the time of their coming within the limits of
the colony; and at the end of the term of ten years, they were to be
set free, as the manner is with English servants”.[541] Either the
framers of the law intended that Indians be included under the terms
“black mankind or white”, or else the subject of Indian slavery had not
yet attracted the attention of the law makers at this time. Probably
the latter is the true explanation of the omission of the term “Indian”
from the act, though at a later time the same restriction of service
was applied to Indians without legislation.
On March 13, 1676, the general assembly convened at Newport and
discussed the Indian situation. An order was given that “no Indian in
this colony shall be a slave”, save only for debts, covenant, etc., “as
if they had been countrymen not at war”.[542] But Rhode Island did not
avail itself of every opportunity to retain captive Indians. On one
occasion the assembly voted, June 30, 1676, to send back to Plymouth
a number of Indians whom Roger Williams had sent there, because they
believed the Indians rightly belonged to the northern colony.[543]
Again, on August 23, 1676, the government held a court martial for
the trial of some Indians whom the Rhode Island troops had captured.
Several of these Indians were sentenced to death for crimes against the
English. Others were freed. None was retained in the colony.[544]
The assembly made an earnest effort to prevent the indiscriminate and
unfair sale of Indians not taking part in the war, by forbidding during
its session in August, 1676, that any Indians be brought into the
colony without permission of the governor and two assistants, under
penalty of a fine of £5 and the forfeit of such Indian or Indians.
The sum of the fine and the forfeited Indians were “to return to the
treasurer of each town”. All persons were declared to be entitled
to half the produce of the Indians whom they might legally bring to
Newport. The other half was to go to the treasury. If such an amount
was not paid in, the said Indians were to be forfeited to the treasurer
of the colony. It was also forbidden to carry any Indian away from
the colony without a permit from the governor, deputy-governor or
two magistrates, upon penalty of the forfeiture of £5. All acts,
orders, commissions, verbal orders, etc., which had been issued by
town councils, councils of war, private orders of officers and “other
ministers of justice”, which related to Indians, were declared legal by
the assembly.[545]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account