Infant Schools and Dissenters: A Vindication of "a letter of affectionate remonstrance," &c., from the mistakes respecting it made by William Geary ... and from the misrepresentations of it made by ... John Perowne ... in their respective pamphletsAlexander, John
Religion
Infant Schools and Dissenters: A Vindication of "a letter of affectionate remonstrance," &c., from the mistakes respecting it made by William Geary ... and from the misrepresentations of it made by ... John Perowne ... in their respective pamphlets
Alexander, John
Church and education -- England
Mr. Perowne complains of the pain which I have produced in him, by what I
have said “about love and union.” “Such things,” says he “_painfully_
remind us of the days of Charles the first.” This Charles, it will be
remembered, as the “head of the church,” in his days, and “out of a like
_pious care for the service of God_, as had his blessed father,”
published the “Book of Sports,” which authorized the people to amuse
themselves with all sorts of games, &c. on the Lord’s day, and which the
clergy read to their congregations after divine service. I have no wish,
however, to mention “Charles the first” to any man of acute sensibility,
and I was not aware that my recommendation of “love and union” would
remind any one of that ill-fated monarch. Mr. Perowne’s peculiar
sensibility on this subject, and the remarkable fact that, in writing a
pamphlet on Infant Schools, he should twice refer to “Charles the first,”
and “our martyred Charles,” is calculated to excite strange suspicions in
the mind of a believer in the doctrine of metempsychosis. Why should
_Mr. Perowne_ feel pain when he is reminded of “Charles the first?” or
why should “love and union” remind him of “our martyred Charles” at all,
except on the principle of the Bramins, that “we should never kill a
flea, lest we inflict _pain_ on the soul of some of our ancestors.” It
is true that Charles frequently boasted that he was “a true son of the
church.” It is true that Charles entertained the very same feelings
against Puritans, as Mr. Perowne does against Dissenters. It is true
that some of the sentiments in Mr. P’s. pamphlet are as precisely _Icôn
Basilikè_ as if they had been dictated by the soul of the headless
monarch. It is true, as Bishop Burnet says, that Charles the first
“loved high and rough measures, but had neither skill to conduct them,
nor height of genius to manage them. _He hated all that offered prudent
and moderate counsels_; and, even when it was necessary to follow such
advices, he hated those that gave them.” It is true—but, to use Mr.
Perowne’s language, “I forbear to finish a picture so painful to
contemplate,” and shall only add, that David Hume, in his history of
England, states that the last word the king said, was, “REMEMBER”—and
that “_great mysteries_ were supposed to be concealed under that
expression.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account