+------+---+---+-------------------------------------------------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+--------+ TABLE 15.--_Percentages of the various types of toes in F1, F2, DR × R and DR × D matings of the polydactyl crosses compared._ +--------+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | | | | _c._ Silkie crosses (reduced | | | _a._ Houdan crosses. | _b._ Silkie crosses. | forms of toe classified as | | No. of | | | typical). | | toes. +--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | Mating | | | F1. | F2. | DR × R | DR × D | F1. | F2. | DR × R | DR × D | F1. | F2. | DR × R | DR × D | +--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | |_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._|_P. ct._| | 4-4 | 27.3 | 47.4 | 67.6 | 5.6 | 9.4 | 31.7 | 67.0 | .. | 4.3 | 30.8 | 66.7 | .. | | 4-5 | 19.1 | 12.1 | 10.8 | 22.2 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 5.6 | 9.4 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 9.4 | | 5-5 | 53.6 | 39.7 | 21.6 | 72.2 | 81.2 | 51.4 | 26.8 | 62.5 | 76.8 | 53.4 | 24.6 | 62.5 | | 4-6 | .. | .3 | .. | .. | .. | 1.0 | .6 | .. | .. | 1.0 | 1.9 | .. | | 5-6 | .. | .5 | .. | .. | .. | 4.3 | .. | 9.4 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 9.4 | | 6-6 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | 3.9 | .. | .. | 8.7 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 18.7 | | 6-7 | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | .. | +--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account