Inheritance of Characteristics in Domestic FowlDavenport, Charles Benedict
Science
Inheritance of Characteristics in Domestic Fowl
Davenport, Charles Benedict
Heredity; Poultry
+------+---------+----------+-------+---------------------------------+
| | | Mother. | | Offspring (No. of toes). |
|Serial| Pen No. +---+------+ f +---+---+---+---+---+---+---------+
| No. | |No.|No. of| |4-4|5-4|5-5|4-6|5-6|6-8| Average.|
| | | | toes.| | | | | | | | |
+------+---------+---+------+-------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---------+
| 1 | 734 815 |499| 6-6 |21{_a_ | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 10.3 |
| | | | | {_b_ | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |17 | 11.4 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2 | 734 815 |773| 6-5 |13{_a_ |.. |.. | 6 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 10.9 |
| | | | | {_b_ |.. |.. | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 11.4 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 3 | 734 |500| 5-5 | 8{_a_ |.. | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 |.. | 10.0 |
| | | | | {_b_ |.. |.. | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10.5 |
+------+---------+---+------+-------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---------+
In table 19 the series _a_ of observed average numbers of filial
toes (10.3, 10.9, 10.0) and the series _b_ obtained by assigning
the typical full number to all reduced types (11.4, 11.4, 10.5) are
decidedly irregular. There is, however, between the parental and the
filial series a correlation of +0.250±0.070. This indicates a slight
tendency for the number of toes in the progeny to vary with those of
the parentage.
The second set of data is derived from special matings made with
hybrids between Houdans and 4-toed races. On the one hand, in pens
728 and 813, cocks with well-developed toes of the duplex type were
mated with hens as nearly as possible of the same sort; while in
pens 765, 769, and 820 cocks with small, imperfectly separated toes
(probably of the duplex type[4]) were mated with hens as far as
possible of the same sort.
[4] I say probably of the duplex type because the cock
of pen 769 had a distally split toe on the right foot, reminding
somewhat of the _reduced_ triplex type. But as the left foot had a
typical duplex thumb, and the triplex is not common in Houdans, it
should probably be classed as duplex.
Tables 20, 21, and 22 give in detail and in summary the distribution
of types of polydactylism in the families from well-developed and in
those from poorly developed parents. They show a great difference
between the offspring of parents with good extra-toe (table 20) and
those with poor extra-toe (table 21). The former yield over 80 per
cent offspring with 5 toes or more on one or both feet, while the
latter yield about 57 per cent of such.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account