Inheritance of Characteristics in Domestic FowlDavenport, Charles Benedict
Science
Inheritance of Characteristics in Domestic Fowl
Davenport, Charles Benedict
Heredity; Poultry
+-------+---------------+---------+
| Type. | Zygotic | Soma. |
| | constitution. | |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _a_ | M2L2[A] | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _b_ | M2Ll | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _c_ | MmL2 | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _d_ | MmLl | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _e_ | M2Ll | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _f_ | M2l2 | I |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _g_ | MmLl | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _h_ | Mml2 | I |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _i_ | mLML | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _k_ | mLMl | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _l_ | m2L2 | oo |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _m_ | m2Ll | oo |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _n_ | mlML | Y |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _o_ | mlMl | I |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _p_ | m2Ll | oo |
+-------+---------------+---------+
| _q_ | m2l2 | Absent |
+-------+---------------+---------+
[A] This convenient form of zygotic formulæ, using a
subscript 2 instead of doubling the letter, is proposed
by Prof. W. E. Castle.
It is a consequence of this second hypothesis that, in F2, of every
16 young 9 should have the Y comb; 3 the I comb; 3 the oo comb,
and 1 no comb at all. It follows further that the progeny of two F2
parents will differ in different families. Thus if a Y-combed bird
of type _a_ be mated with a bird of any type, _all_ of the progeny
will have the Y comb.
From Y-combed parents of various types taken at random 4 kinds of
families will arise having the following percentage distribution of
the different types of comb:
1. Y comb, 100 per cent.
2. Y comb, 75 per cent; I comb, 25 per cent.
3. Y comb, 75 per cent; oo comb, 25 per cent.
4. Y comb, 56.25 per cent; I comb, 18.75 per cent; oo comb,
18.75 per cent; absent, 6.25 per cent.
Again, mating two extracted I combs of F2 should yield, in F3, two
types of families in equal frequency as follows:
1. I comb, 100 per cent.
2. I comb, 75 per cent; no comb, 25 per cent.
Again, mating two extracted oo combs of F2 should yield, in F3, two
types of families in equal frequency, as follows:
1. oo comb, 100 per cent.
2. oo comb, 75 per cent; no comb, 25 per cent.
Single comb × Y comb should give families of the types:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account