An examination of these families shows not one composed exclusively of Y-combed individuals nor those (of significant size) containing Y-combed and I-combed or oo-combed individuals exclusively, much less in the precise proportion of 3:1, yet such should be the commonest families if the second hypothesis were true. Notwithstanding the marked deviation--to be discussed later--from the expected proportions of I, 25 per cent; Y, 50 per cent; oo, 25 per cent, the result accords better with the first or third hypothesis. Since on either of these hypotheses the same proportions of the various types of comb are to be expected in the progeny of Y-combed parents of whatever generation, it is worth recording that from such parents belonging to all generations except the first the results given in table 4 were obtained, and it will be noticed that these results approach expectation on the first or third hypothesis. TABLE 4. +-----------+-------+-------+-------+---------+--------+ | | I | Y | oo | Absent. | Total. | +-----------+-------+-------+-------+---------+--------+ |Frequency | 235 | 291 | 144 | 12 | 682 | | | | | | | | |Percentage | 34.5 | 42.7 | 21.1 | 1.8 | .... | +-----------+-------+-------+-------+---------+--------+ The progeny of two extracted single-combed parents of the F2 generation give in 3 families the following totals: Of 95 F3 offspring, 94 have single combs; one was recorded from an unhatched chick as having a _slightly_ split comb, but this was probably a single comb with a slight side-spur, a form that is associated with purely I-combed germ-cells. This result is in perfect accord with the second and third hypotheses, but is irreconcilable with the first hypothesis. The progeny of two extracted oo-combed parents is given in table 5. TABLE 5.