Following on this picture he speaks of the way in which conscious
actions become automatic and makes a statement to the effect that
“_There is evidence to show that the axons_ (or processes of the
nerve-cells which extend unbroken from nerve-cell to its termination)
_become covered with a adulated coat as each new tract is formed. Thus
the structure, like the habit, becomes fixed_”--and--“_It would appear
as if, by repeated experiences, tracts and pathways must be beaten
through the nervous system_”[83] (Italics not in original).
[83] _Op. cit._, p. 371.
Beside this I place a statement from Professor Graham Kerr as to his
view of the development of peripheral nerve-trunks. He is reviewing
the “outgrowth” theory of His, the “chain cell” theory of Balfour, and
the “Primitive Continuity” theory of Hensen, and expresses himself as
follows: “_It is suggested that the development of the actual nerve
fibril is simply the coming into view of a pathway produced by the
repeated passage of nerve impulses over a given route._”[84] (Italics
not in original.)
[84] _Text Book of Embryology._ Vertebrata with the exception of
Mammalia. Vol. II., 1919, p. 106.
A passage from Professor McDougall’s _Physiological Psychology_ may
also be referred to at more length than it was in Chapter III.,
page 25. Speaking of the automatization of voluntarily acquired actions
which have been explained by the view that purely reflex actions
carried out by mechanisms of the spinal level were also originally
acquired by our original ancestors as voluntary actions, he says, “This
view is usually associated with the name of Wundt, who has forcibly
advocated it. It implies, of course, the assumption that acquired
characters are in some degree transmitted from one generation to
another, a proposition which most biologists at the present time are
inclined to deny because they cannot conceive how such transmissions
can be effected. Nevertheless, the rejection of this view leaves
us with insuperable difficulties when we attempt to account for
the evolution of the nervous system, and there are no established
facts with which it is incompatible. If, therefore, we accept this
view we shall regard the congenital neural dispositions, both those
that determine pure reflexes and those that determine instinctive
actions, as having been acquired and consolidated under the guidance
of individual experience, with the co-operation, to a degree which we
cannot determine, of natural selection.”[85]
[85] _Physiological Psychology._ W. McDougall, p. 156 (1911).
These three statements from a physiologist, a zoologist, and a
psychologist, all of great eminence, though they differ in particular
problems studied, tell very strongly in favour of the position here put
forward as to initiative in the production of specialised innervation
of the skin.
Origin of Cold, Warm, Pain and Touch Spots.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account