The headings of the chapters describe the facts, and there is no
need to enumerate them here. The first and largest group is studied
according to a method which is in a measure applied to all the others.
Most of them are external or superficial phenomena and accordingly are
open to others beside the expert for observation and corroboration, or
the reverse. The typical plan adopted is as follows: a large number
of related phenomena are chosen, and the more prominent of these are
observed and described. Keeping in mind the two plain issues laid down,
the origin of initial modifications and their transmission, I have
selected the facts because, especially such as those of the hair, they
are very simple, of wide distribution in animals well known to us,
such as the domestic horse and man, and none are brought forward which
any other observer cannot study for himself if he has some anatomical
and physiological knowledge, some training and care in recording
observations. In most centres of population there are still left a good
supply of horses in streets and stables, of preserved specimens in
museums and living ones in zoological gardens, and of hairy young men
who will hardly refuse a polite request to examine the minute hairs
clothing their trunks and limbs. One has to pursue a certain amount
of that study which may be called the sister of plant-ecology, that
is, animal-ecology or the behaviour of animals at home. The student of
these matters, it may be freely admitted, will complain, unless he has
some hypothesis or line of thought to follow, that he has been set down
in a valley in which the bones are very many and very dry. But, armed
or primed with an hypothesis, he may find an affirmative answer to his
question “Can these bones live?” Every group of natural phenomena,
_without exception_, has some meaning for those who will interpret
nature rather than bully and slight her, and whatever anointed king
may claim sovereignty over it the humble fact cannot be denied that
“whatever phenomenon is, _is_.”[40] Again I would refer to Howes’
inspiring note: “We live by ideas; we advance by a knowledge of the
facts; content to discover the meaning of phenomena, since the nature
of things will be for ever beyond our grasp.”[41] The facts adduced
are simple, have a chance of recurring and are widely distributed
among multicellular animals--the botanists and plants can very well
take care of themselves. I must once more state that I am attaching
to the considered facts a value of a somewhat unusual kind--_their
intrinsic unimportance_. For anyone who has had to encounter the
skilful dialectics and counter-attacks of a well-equipped neo-Darwinian
it is well that he should remember the maxim of Napoleon, “Be
vulnerable nowhere.” It is necessary to show evidence for Lamarckian
factors in which no degree of selective value, survival-value, can
be seen by hostile sharp-shooter while he works in his trench. The
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account